Did Abigail Spanberger vote for or against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act in 2021 or 2022?

1. What the roll‑call record actually shows — a clear 2023 “Nay”

The only explicit roll‑call included in the materials is the House vote on H.R. 26, the Born‑Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, held January 11, 2023, where Rep. Abigail Spanberger is listed as voting Nay. That roll call is presented in multiple summaries and a detailed vote list indicating a party‑line pattern with most Democrats opposing the bill and most Republicans supporting it ^{[1] [4]}. This is a direct, dated vote record and establishes her stance at that moment. The presence of a recorded “Nay” in 2023 means any claim that she voted for the bill in that session is contradicted by the roll‑call evidence provided ^[1].

2. Why 2021 and 2022 are ambiguous in these files

The documents supplied include the text of a 2021 introduced version of the bill and ancillary analyses of votes and procedure, but they do not contain a 2021 or 2022 roll‑call showing Spanberger voting for or against the Born‑Alive bill itself. The bill text and introduction materials explain the proposed legal changes but do not record individual representative votes ^[2]. Other materials note procedural moves and related amendments in 2021 and 2022, including opposition to a discharge petition and procedural votes, but they stop short of documenting a definitive recorded floor vote by Spanberger on H.R. 619 or identical measures in those years ^[3].

3. Procedural activity and related votes that can create confusion

The supplied analyses note Spanberger’s opposition to a 2021 discharge petition and to certain procedural amendments in 2022, actions that are distinct from final roll‑call votes on a full bill. A discharge petition or a procedural motion can prevent a bill from reaching the floor or change its course; votes on those measures often get conflated with votes on the substantive bill. The sources indicate Spanberger opposed moves that would have advanced or altered related legislation in 2021 and 2022, which explains why some trackers characterize her record as opposing Born‑Alive efforts, without presenting an explicit 2021/2022 recorded vote on the exact bill text ^[3].

4. How interest‑group scorecards and summaries interpret her record

Advocacy organizations compile scorecards and narratives that interpret votes, procedural positions, and co‑sponsorships as part of a lawmaker’s stance. The National Pro‑Life Scorecard and similar summaries in the material portray Spanberger as consistently opposing pro‑life measures and cite procedural opposition in 2021 and 2022 as evidence ^[3]. These characterizations reflect an agenda—they emphasize patterns of opposition and procedural votes to rate her — but they do not replace an official roll‑call record for the specific bill in those earlier years. Readers should treat scorecard conclusions as interpretive summaries rather than verbatim legislative roll calls ^[3].

5. Bottom line and recommendations for verification

Based on the provided materials, the verified fact is that Rep. Abigail Spanberger voted against the Born‑Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act in the January 11, 2023 House roll call ^[1]. The materials do not show a separate recorded vote by her on that bill in 2021 or 2022; she engaged in related procedural opposition in those years, which can be and has been interpreted by interest groups as opposition to Born‑Alive measures ^[3]. For definitive confirmation beyond these documents, consult the official House roll‑call archives or a congressional vote database for 2021 and 2022; the 2023 roll call is the clearest, directly cited record in the sources supplied ^{[4] [1]}.