Did any ethics probes into Adam Schiff result in fines, reprimands, or formal sanctions?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting shows active investigations and a congressional censure resolution related to Adam Schiff, but none of the cited articles report that any ethics probe of Schiff has produced a fine, reprimand, or formal sanction (not found in current reporting). Multiple outlets describe a DOJ grand-jury review of a mortgage-fraud referral and a House censure resolution that at times included a proposed $16 million fine [1] [2] [3].
1. What the news reports now: DOJ scrutiny of the mortgage-fraud matters
Federal prosecutors in Maryland have convened a grand jury to examine how a mortgage-fraud inquiry involving Sen. Adam Schiff was handled; subpoenas to witnesses like Christine Bish seek communications tied to FHFA chief Bill Pulte and DOJ official Ed Martin, and reporting stresses the probe is focused on the handling of the investigation rather than on an ethics committee sanction of Schiff himself [4] [5] [6].
2. Where the potential sanctions discussion appears: House resolutions and proposed fines
A Republican-drafted House resolution circulating in 2025 recommended censuring and condemning Representative Adam Schiff and included language saying that if an ethics committee determined he lied and abused sensitive information he “should be fined in the amount of $16,000,000” — that is a provision in the bill text, not an enacted fine or a concluded ethics finding [2]. Earlier reporting of the 2023 House censure showed a provision for a $16 million fine was removed from the version that passed the House, and that action was debated along partisan lines [3].
3. No reporting of fines, reprimands, or formal ethics sanctions to date
Across the sources provided — Reuters, CNN, PBS, The Guardian, Axios, The Hill and others — journalists report investigations, subpoenas, and a congressional censure resolution; none of these sources report that an ethics probe has resulted in a formal reprimand, monetary fine, or other sanction against Schiff (not found in current reporting) [4] [5] [7] [8] [1] [6].
4. Distinguishing types of actions: criminal probe vs. congressional discipline vs. ethics findings
The DOJ grand-jury activity described is a criminal investigative mechanism scrutinizing the conduct around referrals and possible mishandling of grand-jury materials; that is separate from congressional or Senate ethics procedures that might impose formal discipline such as censure or fines. The House censure discussed is a political rebuke that, in prior iterations, was debated with and without a fine provision — but a censure or proposed fine in a resolution is not the same as an ethics committee finding or a judicial penalty [6] [2] [3].
5. Competing narratives and political context
Reporting repeatedly notes the partisan context: individuals pushing the mortgage referrals are described as allies of the Trump administration (Bill Pulte and Ed Martin), and outlets emphasize scrutiny of whether those actors improperly involved outsiders or shared sensitive materials [4] [8]. Conservative outlets and watchdog groups have pressed ethics and criminal complaints against Schiff [9], while mainstream outlets frame current probes as centered on the conduct of those pushing the allegations rather than on confirmed wrongdoing by Schiff [7] [10].
6. Limits of the public record and what’s next
Available sources show subpoenas and an active grand-jury review but do not report final outcomes; the DOJ review of its own handling and any referral to disciplinary bodies remains ongoing in the pieces cited [4] [5] [11]. If you are seeking confirmation of a fine, reprimand, or formal ethics sanction, current reporting does not document such an outcome — future developments could change that, but those developments are not in the materials provided here (not found in current reporting) [1] [7].
Sources cited above: Reuters, CNN, GV Wire, PBS, The Guardian, Axios, The Hill, GovTrack text of H.Res.489, and related coverage as referenced in [4] through [1].