Fact check: Has Adam Schiff been formally charged or indicted for any crimes?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, Adam Schiff has not been formally charged or indicted for any crimes ^{[1] [2]}. While President Donald Trump has accused Senator Schiff of mortgage fraud, these remain allegations without formal criminal charges ^{[1] [3]}.

The analyses reveal that a criminal case has been referred to the Justice Department regarding allegations that Schiff falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms ^{[4] [5] [6]}. However, a referral is not equivalent to formal charges or an indictment - it simply means the matter has been passed to prosecutors for review.

Schiff has consistently denied all allegations, with his office characterizing them as "baseless" and politically motivated retribution ^{[3] [5] [6]}. The only formal action taken against Schiff mentioned in the sources is a House censure - which is a formal disapproval but not a criminal charge or indictment ^[7].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks important context about the political dynamics surrounding these allegations. The analyses suggest this may be part of a larger pattern of Trump using federal bureaucracy to target political enemies ^[2].

Key missing context includes:

• The timing and political motivation behind these allegations, which emerged during a period of heightened political tensions
• The distinction between accusations, referrals, and actual charges - many sources conflate these different stages of potential legal proceedings
• Schiff's role as a prominent Trump critic during the Russia investigation and impeachment proceedings, which provides important background for understanding the political context ^{[8] [9]}

Alternative viewpoints present:

• Trump supporters would benefit from these allegations being perceived as legitimate, as it undermines a key political opponent
• Democratic allies and Schiff supporters benefit from framing these as politically motivated attacks designed to distract from other issues
• Legal experts and justice system advocates would benefit from emphasizing the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself is relatively neutral and factual. However, potential bias could emerge in how the answer is interpreted or used:

• Conflating allegations with charges: Some sources blur the line between accusations and formal legal proceedings ^{[4] [5]}
• Political framing: The analyses show clear partisan divisions, with some sources presenting the allegations as credible ^[4] while others characterize them as politically motivated attacks ^{[2] [6]}
• Incomplete reporting: Some analyses focus heavily on the accusations without adequately emphasizing that no formal charges have been filed ^{[4] [5]}

The question itself appears to seek factual clarification, but readers should be aware that the absence of formal charges does not necessarily validate or invalidate the underlying allegations - it simply means the legal process has not reached that stage.