Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Has Adam Schiff been charged with treason?

Checked on August 23, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the comprehensive analysis of multiple sources, Adam Schiff has not been charged with treason. All sources consistently confirm that no formal treason charges have been filed against the California Senator [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6].

However, the sources reveal that Donald Trump has repeatedly accused Schiff of treason and called for his prosecution on numerous occasions [1] [2]. Trump has specifically tweeted that Schiff should be "questioned at the highest level for Fraud & Treason" and charged with "lying to Congress" [4]. Trump has also labeled Schiff a "scam artist" who should be arrested for treason [2].

The sources indicate that Schiff has denied all wrongdoing and called the allegations "baseless smears" [2]. Schiff has accused Trump of trying to intimidate and silence him [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial constitutional context. Treason is specifically defined by the U.S. Constitution and does not apply to political speech [4]. This legal distinction is fundamental to understanding why no treason charges have been filed despite Trump's repeated accusations.

The sources reveal additional investigations beyond treason allegations. The Justice Department is investigating potential mortgage fraud against Schiff [2], and there are allegations of Schiff leaking classified information [5]. Additionally, the House passed a resolution censuring Adam Schiff [6], though this is a political action rather than a criminal charge.

Schiff has created a legal defense fund to address the Trump-spurred inquiries [2], indicating the financial burden these investigations have placed on him.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The question itself appears neutral, but it may inadvertently perpetuate misinformation by suggesting that treason charges against Schiff are a legitimate possibility. The framing could lead readers to assume such charges are under serious consideration when all available evidence shows no formal treason charges have been filed.

Trump would benefit politically from promoting the narrative that his political opponents like Schiff are traitors, as this reinforces his claims about a "deep state" conspiracy and justifies his calls for retribution against those who investigated him. Conversely, Schiff and his political allies benefit from framing Trump's actions as politically motivated intimidation tactics designed to silence opposition.

The sources demonstrate that Trump has used the FBI and Justice Department to escalate his long-standing feud with Adam Schiff [1], suggesting these investigations may be politically motivated rather than based on legitimate criminal evidence.

Want to dive deeper?
What are the legal grounds for treason charges in the US?
Has Adam Schiff ever been formally accused of treason by the DOJ?
What role did Adam Schiff play in the Trump impeachment proceedings?
Can members of Congress be charged with treason for their legislative actions?
How does the US Constitution define treason and its penalties?