Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What legislation did Al Franken get passed in congress
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, Al Franken had a modest but focused legislative record during his Senate tenure from 2009-2017. According to GovTrack data, Franken was the primary sponsor of 4 bills that were enacted into law [1]:
- Quicker Veterans Benefits Delivery Act of 2017
- Adding Zika Virus to the FDA Priority Review Voucher Program Act
- Comprehensive Justice and Mental Health Act of 2015
- Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Non-Intercourse Act of 2013
His first piece of legislation was the Service Dogs for Veterans Act, which passed the Senate by unanimous consent [2]. Additionally, Franken was a lead proponent of the USA Freedom Act, which reformed NSA surveillance powers originally granted by the Patriot Act, and he wrote sections dealing with government agency disclosure of data collection procedures [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question significantly understates Franken's legislative impact by focusing only on standalone bills. Franken was particularly effective at incorporating provisions into larger pieces of legislation [4]. Key missing context includes:
- Provisions added to the Affordable Care Act, including requirements for health insurance premium spending and a national diabetes prevention program [2]
- Provisions included in the Violence Against Women Act and the farm bill [4]
- Securing $55 million in mental health service grants for schools [4]
This approach of adding amendments to major legislation rather than passing standalone bills is a common and often more effective legislative strategy, as it allows senators to achieve policy goals without the difficulty of shepherding entire bills through the complex congressional process.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains no explicit misinformation but creates a misleading framework by implying that only standalone bills "passed in Congress" constitute meaningful legislative achievement. This framing:
- Ignores the reality of how most legislative work is accomplished through amendments and provisions in larger bills
- Undervalues Franken's actual legislative effectiveness, as noted by sources that highlight his success in getting provisions added to major legislation [4]
- Fails to account for the collaborative nature of the legislative process, where senators often achieve policy goals through strategic amendments rather than standalone bills
The question would be more accurate if it asked about Franken's overall legislative achievements or contributions to enacted legislation, rather than focusing narrowly on bills he personally shepherded to passage.