Did the ANA or state nursing groups pursue legal action or formal petitions against Trump-era regulatory changes?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The American Nurses Association responded to multiple Trump-era regulatory moves primarily with public condemnation, lobbying and a membership petition urging the Department of Education to reclassify nursing as a “professional degree,” but the association itself is not shown in these sources to have launched federal litigation; by contrast, some state and union-affiliated nursing organizations did join lawsuits or allied legal challenges against administration actions (notably an OSHA-related suit that included the Washington State Nurses Association) while state groups also issued formal condemnations and advocacy statements [1] [2] [3].
1. ANA’s playbook: petitions, advocacy and public condemnations, not documented courtroom filings
Across the reporting, the American Nurses Association reacted to Trump administration policy changes — from attempts to weaken the Affordable Care Act to Title X family-planning rules and the Education Department’s redefinition of “professional degree” — with public statements condemning the actions and with direct advocacy such as a petition calling on the Department of Education to include nursing in the professional-degree category, along with action alerts for members [4] [5] [1]. The Nurse.org reporting documents an ANA-led petition explicitly urging the Department to revise its proposed definition to protect student loan eligibility for graduate nursing programs [1], and mainstream outlets cite ANA alarm over loan-cap changes that would restrict graduate funding [6] [7]. None of the provided sources, however, show ANA itself filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration on the education reclassification or related regulatory changes.
2. Where litigation did occur: unions and state nursing associations in court
Legal challenges tied to healthcare workplace protections under the Trump administration did include nursing organizations as plaintiffs or allies: a suit challenging the administration’s shelving of an OSHA Infectious Diseases Standard listed organizations including AFT, AFSCME, WSNA and UNAC/UHCP — demonstrating that at least some state-level nursing unions (WSNA is named) participated in litigation to force stronger protections for healthcare workers [2]. This indicates a differentiation between ANA’s federal lobbying and the readiness of labor-affiliated, state-level nursing unions and allied groups to take regulatory disputes to court.
3. State nursing groups: condemnation, mobilization and, in some cases, legal posture
Multiple state and specialty nursing organizations issued formal condemnations and mobilized members in response to federal rule changes; the Massachusetts Nurses Association publicly condemned the Education Department’s decision to strip “professional” status from advanced nursing degrees and framed the action as a threat to workforce and patient care [3]. The sources portray state groups engaging in advocacy, public pressure and coordination with lawmakers — including participation in letters from bipartisan lawmakers urging change — but only some (notably unions with collective-bargaining and litigation capacity) appear in documented lawsuits in the provided material [8] [3].
4. Two tracks of resistance: policy advocacy vs. courtroom strategy
The reporting suggests two distinct resistance paths: national professional associations such as ANA leaning on advocacy, petitions, legislative outreach and public messaging to reshape policy [1] [9], while unions and state nurse associations — often with closer ties to labor coalitions and legal nonprofits — pursued litigation where workplace-safety or regulatory-shelving issues were at stake [2]. Just Security’s litigation tracker confirms a broad ecosystem of legal challenges to Trump-era executive actions, indicating many actors chose courtrooms as a venue even if ANA itself is not listed in the supplied litigation narratives [10].
5. Limits of the public record in these sources
The available reporting documents ANA-led petitions and multiple state/union condemnations and at least one multiorganization lawsuit that included a state nurses association, but it does not provide an exhaustive litigation roster showing every legal step taken by ANA or every state nursing group; therefore, assertions beyond these documented petitions, public statements and the named OSHA-related suit would require additional source material to confirm [1] [2] [3].