Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the main tactics used by contemporary anarchist groups for social change?
Executive Summary
Contemporary anarchist groups deploy a mix of prefigurative community-building, direct action (including protest and sabotage), mutual aid distribution, media activism, and experimentation with autonomous governance models to pursue social change; these tactics are evident across varied geographies and movements between September and December 2025 [1] [2] [3]. Reporting from autonomist collectives, anarchist media, and movement-focused dispatches shows a pattern: groups pair visible disruption with long-term capacity-building and solidarity work, while debates persist inside movements about the ethics and efficacy of escalation versus sustained community practices [2] [4].
1. How video and media work shape resistance and identity
Anarchist video collectives like sub.Media use media activism to amplify Indigenous resurgence, prefigurative politics, and solidarity networks, treating media production as both outreach and a form of resistance that contests dominant narratives and builds cross-movement ties; this role is analyzed in December 2025 reporting on sub.Media’s support for Wet’suwet’en and related struggles [1]. These outputs function as propaganda of the deed in cultural terms: they document direct actions, circulate critiques of state and corporate power, and articulate alternative social forms, while also helping decentralized groups coordinate and recruit without formal hierarchies [1].
2. Direct action’s persistent place—and the rise of sabotage in climate fights
Direct action remains central to anarchist tactics, ranging from mass street protests to targeted sabotage, with a noted increase in property-focused disruption within climate activism in 2025, exemplified by UK-based groups advocating infrastructure attacks to pressure fossil-fuel actors [3] [2]. Coverage from September 2025 shows anarchist-aligned movements oscillating between nonviolent disruption and more confrontational sabotage; supporters frame such tactics as necessary to escalate pressure, while critics within and outside movements warn of legal backlash, repression, and potential alienation of broader publics [2] [3].
3. Mutual aid and mobile distribution as everyday prefiguration
Anarchist collectives are expanding mutual aid through mobile distroism—using vehicles and bikes to deliver food, supplies, and information where traditional distribution faces obstacles—presented in movement zines and November 2025 reporting as practical prefigurative infrastructure [4]. This tactic emphasizes building alternative economic and social relations by meeting immediate needs while creating durable networks of reciprocal aid; it reduces reliance on institutions, strengthens local solidarity, and functions as a practical demonstration of anarchist principles aimed at both survival and recruitment [4] [5].
4. Autonomy projects and the Zapatistas’ influence on horizontal governance
The Zapatistas’ 2025 launch of “The Commons” highlights an ongoing model within anarchist practice: grassroots autonomy and horizontal decision-making designed to institutionalize self-governance and critique centralized systems, reported in September 2025 coverage of their new stage of autonomy [2]. This example shows how anarchist-inspired groups combine local institutional experiments with transnational calls for solidarity; their emphasis on internal critique and recalibration suggests awareness of governance pitfalls and an effort to model sustainable collective structures that resist co-optation [2].
5. Repression, prisoners, and movement vulnerability
Reporting across September–December 2025 documents state repression, arrests of anarchist activists, and campaigns around prisoner rights, indicating that both overt disruption and high-profile actions attract intensified policing and legal penalties [2] [6]. Movement media and solidarity networks prioritize legal defense, mail and communication campaigns for detained comrades, and publicizing repression to mobilize international attention; the prevalence of such responses shapes tactical choices, pushing some groups toward lower-profile mutual aid work while others double down on confrontational approaches [6].
6. Ideological debates: escalation versus prefiguration
Contemporary anarchist discourse in late 2025 reveals a central split: those advocating escalatory sabotage and targeted disruption argue urgency requires aggressive pressure tactics, while those prioritizing prefigurative projects and long-term capacity-building emphasize building alternative institutions and alliances [3] [1]. Articles and zines from movement actors reflect this debate, manifesting in different tactical mixes across contexts—insurrectionary pushes in Nepal’s reported uprisings and community-focused organizing via distro collectives show how local conditions and movement histories shape strategic choices [5] [4].
7. What’s omitted and where evidence gaps remain
Available reporting from September–December 2025 concentrates on visible campaigns, media collectives, climate sabotage, mutual aid, and Zapatista-inspired autonomy, but systematic empirical data on effectiveness, public opinion, and long-term outcomes is limited; most sources are movement-aligned analyses or translations of activist communiqués, which risks selection bias and over-emphasizing successes or radical tactics [1] [6] [3]. Comparative metrics—recidivism of repression effects, recruitment patterns post-action, and measured service delivery outcomes for mutual aid—remain underreported, leaving room for further scholarly or journalistic follow-ups to assess which tactics sustainably advance social change [1] [5].