"Owning guns is not a right, if it were a right it would be in the constitution." -Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Checked on September 22, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Was this fact-check helpful?

1. Summary of the results

The statement "Owning guns is not a right, if it were a right it would be in the constitution" by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is contradicted by several analyses. The right to bear arms is explicitly mentioned in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which suggests that owning guns is indeed considered a right [1]. This is further supported by the U.S. Supreme Court's establishment of the right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense [1]. Additionally, sources such as [4] and [5] argue that the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms, implying that owning guns is a constitutional right. On the other hand, some analyses, such as [2], suggest that Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez may not consider gun ownership an absolute right, given her support for gun reform legislation. However, these analyses do not directly address the statement about gun ownership being a right in the Constitution [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key point missing from the original statement is the explicit mention of the Second Amendment in the U.S. Constitution, which protects the right to bear arms [1]. Another important context is the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions on gun rights, which have established the right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense [1]. Alternative viewpoints, such as those presented in [6] and [3], highlight the importance of gun ownership for self-defense, especially in rural areas, and note that about a third of U.S. adults say they personally own a gun, implying that gun ownership is a significant aspect of American society [3]. Furthermore, sources like [4] and [5] provide additional context by discussing the NRA's stance on gun rights and the importance of the Second Amendment, which suggests that owning guns is a right [4] [5].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez may be considered misleading or biased, as it implies that owning guns is not a right because it is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution [2]. However, as sources such as [1] and [5] point out, the Second Amendment does protect the right to bear arms, which includes the right to own guns [1] [5]. This omission may benefit those who advocate for stricter gun control measures, as it frames gun ownership as not being a constitutional right [2]. On the other hand, sources like [4] and [5], which argue that owning guns is a constitutional right, may benefit the NRA and other gun rights advocacy groups [4] [5]. Ultimately, the statement's potential misinformation or bias may be attributed to the complex and contentious nature of the gun control debate in the United States [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What does the Second Amendment of the US Constitution say about gun ownership?
How have US courts interpreted the right to bear arms in recent years?
What are the arguments for and against stricter gun control laws in the US?
How does Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's stance on gun control compare to other Democratic lawmakers?
What are the current federal and state laws regarding gun ownership in the US?