Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Who wants to bring back asbestos?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses, the Trump administration is the primary entity seeking to bring back asbestos use in the United States. The EPA under Trump is reconsidering the Biden-era ban on the last type of asbestos used in the US, representing a direct reversal of public health protections [1] [2]. This decision comes despite asbestos being linked to 40,000 U.S. deaths and 250,000 worldwide deaths annually [3].
The chemical industry lobby is also actively working to bring back asbestos. Specifically, the American Chemistry Council is working to halt the asbestos ban within the EPA [4], while both the US Chamber of Commerce and the American Chemistry Council have opposed the ban and used various tactics to delay or prevent its implementation [5].
In stark contrast, the Biden-Harris administration finalized a ban on ongoing uses of asbestos in March 2024, demonstrating their commitment to protecting public health rather than bringing back asbestos [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks crucial context about the financial motivations behind wanting to bring back asbestos. The chemical industry stands to benefit significantly from reversing the asbestos ban, as they can continue manufacturing and selling asbestos-containing products without the costs associated with finding safer alternatives [4] [5].
Trump has previously expressed support for asbestos use despite well-documented health risks, suggesting this policy reversal aligns with his historical positions rather than being based on new scientific evidence [2].
Health advocates are deeply concerned about the Trump administration's decision, arguing it represents a threat to public health and an attempt to undermine science-based safeguards [3]. The timing is particularly concerning given that asbestos exposure risks have been highlighted in recent disasters, such as the California wildfires potentially spreading toxic asbestos [7].
The question also omits the established timeline: the Biden administration successfully banned asbestos in 2024, and the Trump administration is now actively working to reverse these protections in 2025.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question appears neutral but potentially misleading by omission. It fails to acknowledge that asbestos was already successfully banned by the previous administration, making this a policy reversal rather than a new initiative [6].
The phrasing "bring back" could minimize the severity of the situation - this isn't about introducing something new, but about reversing established public health protections that prevent tens of thousands of deaths annually [3].
The question also doesn't reflect the scientific consensus that asbestos causes mesothelioma and other cancers, potentially giving equal weight to industry interests versus established public health science [1] [2].