Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Are there official transcripts or video of the Attorney General's speech or interview containing the 'two bullets' quote?

Checked on November 6, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive Summary

The “two bullets” line traces to private text messages from Jay Jones dating to 2022, not to a public Attorney General speech or televised interview; contemporary reporting locates the quote in those texts and no official transcript or video has surfaced showing Jones saying the phrase aloud. News outlets that published or reviewed the messages report Jones apologized and party leaders reacted, while opponents amplified the line in campaign materials [1] [2] [3].

1. How the quote first re-emerged and why it matters to the campaign trail

Reporting shows the contested phrase did not appear in a public speech or interview but in a private text-message exchange that resurfaced during the 2025 campaign, first publicized by outlets that obtained the texts and by social posts sharing screenshots. Journalists and outlets that examined the material emphasize the provenance: texts sent in 2022 between Jones and another lawmaker were circulated to media and political operatives, and those messages are the primary documentary source for the “two bullets” wording rather than any recorded public remarks [1] [2] [3]. The distinction matters because private texts and public speeches carry different legal, ethical, and political implications, and the debate quickly moved from whether Jones said the words to the political fallout and how opponents would use them.

2. What multiple outlets reported — agreement on facts, variety in emphasis

Major outlets uniformly report the origin of the phrase as texts and note that Jones apologized; however, reporting varies in emphasis. Some pieces foreground the explicit text content and the inflammatory nature of the language, reproducing the line and focusing on calls for accountability, while other outlets place the revelations in the context of a bruising campaign and Democratic reluctance to eject a nominee in a key race. Coverage cites the same core documents but frames them either as a personal lapse now weaponized by opponents or as evidence of unacceptable rhetoric that merits consequences. All accounts that examined the messages agree no official public transcript or video has been published showing Jones uttering the phrase in a speech or interview [2] [3] [4].

3. Candidate response, party reactions, and differing incentives

Jones publicly apologized, saying he was “embarrassed, ashamed, and sorry” and characterizing the messages as unacceptable rhetoric. Democratic leaders stopped short of demanding his withdrawal in some reports, citing strategic considerations about competitive statewide races and the difficulty of replacing nominees late in the cycle; others within the party urged accountability, reflecting internal tension between ethics and electoral pragmatism. Republican opponents seized the line as a campaign weapon, incorporating it into stickers and attack materials to frame Jones as violent or unfit, which amplified the political salience of the texts beyond the original private context [4] [5] [1].

4. Verification: why reporters treat texts differently than public remarks

Reporters and outlets treat private messages and public statements with distinct verification standards. A private text message may be authenticated by recipients, contemporaneous metadata, or corroboration by additional parties, but it is not the same as a recorded public statement with an official transcript. The published accounts stress that the texts were obtained and reviewed by outlets or posted by third parties; they do not point to any official transcript, audio, or video of Jones saying the “two bullets” phrase in a speech or interview. That absence has left the factual claim about the origin of the wording stable across coverage: it belongs to a private exchange, not a documented public address [1] [6] [3].

5. Opponents’ amplification versus journalistic restraint — different incentives at play

Opponents and advocacy groups amplified the phrase aggressively because memorable, salacious lines travel easily in campaigns; they used stickers, ads, and social posts to enshrine the phrase in voters’ minds. Journalists, by contrast, reproduced the texts while noting provenance and context, often resisting rhetorical framing that would suggest the line was spoken publicly without a direct transcript or recording. This divergence reveals incentives: campaigns aim for maximal political damage; reporters aim to show evidence and context, hence repeated clarification that no public speech or interview transcript exists showing Jones voiced the phrase aloud [5] [2] [3].

6. Bottom line — what can be definitively stated now

Definitive facts from the record: the “two bullets” phrase appears in private text messages from 2022 attributed to Jay Jones, which were published or circulated in 2025 reporting; Jones apologized for the messages; and multiple news outlets report party and opponent responses. No official transcript or publicly released video has been produced that shows Jones saying the phrase in a speech or interview, and reporting across outlets consistently reflects that absence. Readers should treat the phrase as sourced to private texts unless and until a verifiable public recording or transcript emerges that contradicts the current record [1] [2] [3] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
Which Attorney General said "two bullets" and when (include year)?
Are there official DOJ transcripts or press release for the speech quoting "two bullets"?
Is there video footage of the Attorney General saying "two bullets" and where to find it?
How have major outlets (e.g., New York Times, Washington Post) reported the Attorney General "two bullets" remark?
Has the Attorney General's office issued a clarification or correction about the "two bullets" quote (include dates)?