Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Energy prices in australia went up by 30% after labor won election in 2025
1. Summary of the results
Based on the comprehensive analysis of available sources, there is no evidence supporting the claim that energy prices in Australia increased by 30% after Labor won the election in 2025. All sources examined fail to provide any data or information confirming this specific price increase [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7].
Instead, the sources focus on Labor's energy policy framework and transition plans. The analyses reveal that Labor's victory established a clear direction toward renewable energy expansion, with 82% renewable energy targeted by 2030 [1]. The election result confirmed that coal and gas will have a fast-declining role and nuclear energy will have none at all in Australia's future energy mix [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original statement omits crucial context about Labor's actual energy policies and their intended outcomes. Sources indicate that Labor made specific energy policy promises aimed at addressing energy prices during their campaign [2], suggesting their platform was designed to manage rather than increase costs.
The analyses reveal that Australia already faced high energy prices prior to the election [5], indicating that energy affordability was a pre-existing challenge rather than a post-election development. Additionally, there are concerns about market instability during the energy transition if not managed properly [7], but this represents potential future risks rather than confirmed price increases.
Energy companies and fossil fuel interests would benefit from narratives that blame renewable energy transitions for price increases, as this could slow policy changes that threaten their market position. Conversely, renewable energy advocates and Labor politicians would benefit from demonstrating that their policies successfully manage energy costs during the transition period.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The statement appears to contain significant misinformation by presenting a specific, dramatic price increase (30%) without any supporting evidence from available sources. This type of claim could be designed to undermine public confidence in Labor's energy policies and the renewable energy transition more broadly.
The statement also exhibits potential bias by attributing causation directly to Labor's election victory without considering other factors that influence energy pricing, such as global market conditions, infrastructure costs, or seasonal variations. The sources suggest that misinformation about renewable energy projects, including wind farms, is prevalent [6], indicating this statement may be part of a broader pattern of misleading claims about clean energy policies.
The timing and specificity of the claim (exactly 30% increase immediately following the election) suggests it may be politically motivated rather than based on factual analysis of energy market data.