What does the average amount of income given through the federal government to illegal aliens entering the United States
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There is no single, authoritative figure for “the average amount of income given through the federal government to illegal aliens” in the available reporting; federal agencies, watchdogs, and advocacy groups instead report piecemeal program-specific costs, estimates, and policy changes (noted examples include claims of billions in program spending and targeted rules to bar benefits) [1] [2] [3]. The Government Accountability Office has said total costs are unknown because data limitations prevent reliable aggregation [4].
1. What reporters and agencies actually measure — and what they don’t
Federal and oversight sources focus on eligibility rules and program-level spending rather than publishing a single “per-person average” for undocumented immigrants. The GAO explicitly found that total costs are unknown because illegal aliens are not required to reveal status and officials are often barred from asking, creating data gaps that prevent reliable totals [4]. Congressional and advocacy reports fill some gaps with estimates for specific programs, but those efforts are not the same as an official, economy-wide per-person average [5] [2].
2. Estimates exist — but they vary widely and come from partisan sources
Several organizations have produced headline figures: AEI’s analysis claims an annual per-taxpayer cost figure and estimates about child tax credit payments to unauthorized households (for example, a $1,156 per-taxpayer cost and $13.4 billion in child tax credits for 2021 cited by AEI-affiliated reporting) [2]. EPIC and affiliated conservative research groups compile and cite studies estimating “billions” in welfare spending and per-household benefit averages (for example, an estimated $5,692 in federal benefits per illegal-immigrant household in one cited study) [1]. These studies use differing time frames, definitions (household vs. individual), and methods for attributing benefits, which explains conflicting totals [1] [2].
3. Legal framework constrains access — and recent rules aim to tighten it
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 broadly bars unauthorized noncitizens from many federal means-tested programs; multiple federal agencies and the White House note that law and subsequent rules shape eligibility [6] [5] [7]. The current administration described a suite of executive and regulatory actions in 2025 to restrict access to certain programs (USDA restrictions on SNAP verification, HHS and ACF letters tightening eligibility verification, and Treasury proposals to limit refundable tax credits) [8] [9] [6] [3] [7].
4. Agencies are actively changing verification and benefit rules — altering future accounting
USDA, HHS/ACF, and Treasury announced steps to require stronger identity and status checks and proposed regulations to exclude refunded portions of certain tax credits for non‑qualified aliens [8] [6] [3]. The White House framed a package of department actions intended “to protect taxpayer-funded benefits for American citizens — NOT illegal aliens,” showing an administration priority to reduce such spending going forward [7]. Those policy changes will complicate longitudinal comparisons because they can reduce future outlays and retroactively change program practices [8] [6] [3].
5. Political narratives amplify uncertainty and produce competing totals
House Republicans and conservative think tanks have released reports dramatizing fiscal costs and labeling programs as funneling taxpayer dollars to unauthorized immigrants; these reports highlight specific programs or pilot grants and quote multi-billion-dollar totals [10] [11]. Advocacy and research groups on different sides of the debate publish contrary framings; the net effect is many competing claims based on differing assumptions rather than a single, verifiable per-person number [10] [11].
6. How a reliable “average” could be constructed — and why it hasn’t been
To calculate an average dollar figure per undocumented person, researchers would need: precise counts of recipients by program, program‑level payments attributable to undocumented recipients, and consistent timeframes. GAO notes such data are unavailable because benefit systems were not designed to capture immigration status and officials are often limited in querying it [4]. Some analysts work around this by modeling likely participation and multiplying by program averages; those methods create plausible ranges but not definitive averages and depend heavily on assumptions [4] [1].
7. Bottom line for readers seeking a simple number
Available sources do not provide a single, authoritative “average amount of income” delivered by the federal government to undocumented immigrants; instead, they offer program-specific estimates, policy announcements to restrict benefits, and watchdog findings that total costs are unknown due to data limitations [4] [1] [9]. If you need an empirically grounded per-person figure, current reporting shows it does not exist publicly; future agency rulemaking and improved verification could change that picture [6] [3].
Limitations: This analysis uses only the supplied documents; other reporting or primary data may exist but is not included here.