What were Barack Obama’s average approval ratings during each year of his second term (2013–2016)?
Executive summary
Barack Obama’s public approval during his second term hovered in the low-to-mid 40s by most major trackers: 2013 saw approvals around the low 40s as his second-term slide took hold, 2014 averaged about 42 percent, 2015 averaged roughly 42.6 percent, and 2016 improved to about 46.2 percent according to Gallup’s year-by-year reporting [1] [2] [3]. Variations across polls and week-to-week swings mean any single number is a simplified snapshot of a polarized, shifting public mood [4] [5].
1. 2013 — The second-term slide becomes visible
Public measurements in late 2013 captured the start of a pronounced decline in Obama’s job approval: Gallup reported the president “wrapped up 2013 with an average 41% approval rating in December,” and contemporaneous coverage described a steady slide through the year amid controversies such as the Affordable Care Act rollout and the federal government shutdown [1] [6]. Pew’s fall 2013 analysis likewise characterized a struggling year with overall job rating down to about 41% and marked weakness on economic issues, underscoring that multiple reputable trackers recorded a similar downshift though month-to-month volatility was substantial [4].
2. 2014 — A roughly steady low‑40s plateau
By the end of 2014, major public polling averaged in the low 40s: PBS cited Gallup’s calculation that Obama’s average for 2014 was about 42 percent, a year in which the president’s approval recovered modestly at times as economic indicators improved and foreign-policy moves earned approval among some groups [2]. That year’s average reflects a plateau rather than a dramatic rebound, and reporting at the time noted rising approval among Hispanics and upticks tied to discrete events—illustrating how demographic shifts and episodic policy actions influence annual averages [2].
3. 2015 — Little overall movement, Gallup’s year‑six estimate
Gallup’s retrospective reporting lists Obama’s sixth-year average at about 42.6 percent, indicating little net change from 2014 and confirming the narrative of a presidency stuck in a polarized, sub‑50 approval range during much of its penultimate year [3]. Analysts at the time emphasized that stagnation reflected persistent partisan polarization—wide Democratic support and near-total Republican opposition—so averages mask intense partisan splits even as the overall number remained in the low 40s [3] [4].
4. 2016 — A measurable rebound into the mid‑40s
Obama’s approval rose in his final year: Gallup reports a 2016 year average of 46.2 percent, and multiple outlets chronicled spikes tied to positive economic news, diplomatic achievements, and improving public sentiment during his final 12 months [3] [5]. While week-to-week polls showed larger swings (Politico highlighted a 50% weekly measure in March 2016), Gallup’s annualized figure of 46.2 percent is the standard year‑level summary cited by scholars and journalists [5] [3].
5. Methodological caveats and why numbers differ across sources
Annual averages depend on the pollster, sampling method, and whether one reports monthly or weekly aggregates versus calendar‑year means: Gallup’s year‑by‑year averages are frequently used for historical comparison [7] [3], but other compilations (e.g., Pew, American Presidency Project, Statista) can show small differences because they draw on different polls, weighting schemes, or time windows [2] [8] [9]. Reporting agendas matter too—some outlets emphasize dramatic weekly swings to tell a political narrative, while institutional trackers aim for smoothed annual measures—so readers should treat single percentages as useful but partial summaries [6] [5].
Conclusion — A low‑40s presidency that finished stronger
Across major trackers and scholarly summaries, Obama’s second-term annual averages cluster in the low 40s for 2013–2015 and move up into the mid‑40s in 2016 (Gallup: ~41% in late 2013, ~42% for 2014, 42.6% in 2015, 46.2% in 2016) while broader polling ecosystems reflect similar patterns with minor variance depending on method and timing [1] [2] [3] [4]. Sources used: Gallup’s year summaries and tracking [1] [3] [7], Pew Research and PBS contemporaneous reporting on annual averages and demographic shifts [4] [2], and mainstream media snapshots that capture weekly peaks and narrative context [5] [6].