Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Who is considered the best US president by historians?
Executive Summary
Historians most commonly place Abraham Lincoln at the top of presidential rankings, with major academic surveys repeatedly listing him as the best U.S. president; George Washington and Franklin D. Roosevelt often follow in the top tier [1] [2] [3]. Alternative scholarly instruments and public-facing polls sometimes elevate Franklin D. Roosevelt or weigh different leadership qualities that reshuffle the order, showing that “best” depends on the survey’s methodology and the evaluators sampled [4] [5] [6].
1. Why Lincoln Dominates Scholarly Rankings — The Pattern and the Numbers
Academic surveys of presidential historians and specialists consistently rank Abraham Lincoln first. The C-SPAN Presidential Historians Survey and other multi-decade compilations place Lincoln at the top because historians credit him with preserving the Union and abolishing slavery—outcomes judged as transformative in American political development [1] [2]. A 2021 C-SPAN compilation reported Lincoln leading with a high composite score, and a separate survey of 154 presidential specialists also identified Lincoln as the top-ranked president with an exceptionally high average score, reflecting broad consensus among professional historians and political scientists who prioritize constitutional survival and emancipation as the defining presidential metric [1] [2] [3]. These surveys standardize questions across cohorts, producing stable results over successive iterations that favor Lincoln’s unique historical impact.
2. The Contenders: Washington and FDR Repeatedly in the Upper Tier
George Washington and Franklin D. Roosevelt appear just behind Lincoln across most scholarly rankings, but for different reasons. Washington is praised for founding precedents—establishing executive norms and peaceful transfer of power—while Franklin D. Roosevelt gets high marks for policy innovation and crisis leadership during the Great Depression and World War II [1] [3]. Different surveys emphasize different leadership qualities; C-SPAN’s framework assesses ten leadership attributes, which tends to place Washington and FDR consistently in the top five because their presidencies altered institutional practice or national capacity in lasting ways [5] [3]. Historians’ clustering of these three figures in the top tier reflects agreement on transformative outcomes rather than identical reasons for praise.
3. When FDR Tops the List: Methodology and Audience Matter
Some research outlets, notably the Siena Research Institute and other studies that weight policy breadth or social welfare impact more heavily, sometimes place Franklin D. Roosevelt at or near the top [4]. These instruments measure categories such as legislative accomplishment, crisis management, and policy legacy, where FDR’s New Deal and wartime mobilization score particularly high. Surveys commissioned by or published for broader audiences can also shift rankings by incorporating non-academic respondents or different scoring rubrics; these methodological differences explain why FDR can outrank Lincoln in certain polls even while professional historians overall favor Lincoln [4] [5]. That variance underscores that rankings are tools reflecting evaluative priorities rather than absolute adjudications of presidential greatness.
4. Diverging Polls and the Role of Non-Academic Surveys
Public-facing or ideologically framed surveys produce noticeably different results. For example, polls driven by conservative organizations or platforms with specific normative criteria may promote presidents who align with their values, and some commercial or advocacy surveys either rank presidents differently or omit scholarly weighting [6]. Business and media lists sometimes mirror popular sentiment rather than specialist consensus, which yields more fluctuation—especially for 20th- and 21st-century presidents whose legacies are contested in partisan frames [7] [6]. When a non-academic instrument diverges from scholarly consensus, its agenda or sample composition is a likely factor; such surveys must be read as reflective of their creators’ priorities rather than as replacements for historian-led assessments [6] [7].
5. What This Means for the Question “Who Is Best?” — A Contextual Answer
The scholarly consensus identifies Abraham Lincoln as the best U.S. president by most academic measures, with Washington and FDR commonly close behind, but any single “best” label depends on what criteria are used—constitutional preservation, precedent-setting, crisis governance, or policy legacy [1] [2] [4]. Different surveys, sampling frames, and weighting of leadership qualities yield different orderings, and public or partisan polls can produce alternate top-ranked presidents for ideological reasons [5] [6]. Readers should treat rankings as comparative tools that clarify historians’ priorities rather than as definitive verdicts, and consult the survey methodology when interpreting why a particular president appears at the top [3] [5].