How many censors did the Biden administration hire?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The original statement inquires about the number of censors hired by the Biden administration. However, upon reviewing the analyses provided, it becomes clear that none of the sources directly answer the question. The closest mention of hiring under the Biden administration comes from a source that reports taxpayers funded over 1.6 million new bureaucrats under the Biden-Harris Administration [1]. Nevertheless, this source does not specify the role of these bureaucrats as censors. Other sources discuss the administration's efforts to influence content moderation on big tech platforms [2], an executive order aimed at restoring freedom of speech and ending federal censorship [3], and a Supreme Court case regarding the government's influence on social media content moderation [4], but none provide a specific number of censors hired. Additionally, several sources do not mention the hiring of censors by the Biden administration at all [5] [6] [7].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key piece of missing context is the definition of a "censor" in the context of the Biden administration's hiring practices, which is not provided by any of the sources [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Alternative viewpoints that could shed more light on the issue include the perspective of the Biden administration itself on what constitutes a "censor" and how many such positions have been created. Furthermore, independent audits or investigations into the administration's hiring practices could provide more objective insights [1]. It's also worth considering the broader context of freedom of speech and censorship in the United States, including how different administrations have approached these issues [2] [3] [4].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may contain potential misinformation or bias by assuming that the Biden administration has hired a significant number of censors without providing evidence. This framing could benefit critics of the Biden administration who aim to portray the administration as restrictive of free speech [1]. On the other hand, the lack of direct evidence from the sources provided could also indicate a lack of transparency from the Biden administration regarding its hiring practices and policies on censorship, which could be seized upon by advocates for government transparency and accountability [5] [6] [7]. Ultimately, without more specific information on the number and roles of individuals hired by the Biden administration in relation to censorship, it's challenging to assess the accuracy of the original statement [2] [3] [4].