Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Is it true that june 14 army parade permit was issued by the Biden administration in 2024
1. Summary of the results
Based on the available analyses, the claim appears to be accurate. The evidence shows that the initial permit for the Army parade was filed on June 12, 2024, during the Biden administration [1]. The Army began planning a 250th anniversary celebration event in Washington in early 2024, which confirms that the planning process started under Biden's presidency [2].
However, the analyses reveal that while the permit was filed under the Biden administration, the plans for the event changed dramatically after Trump's election [1]. The actual parade that took place on June 14, 2025, was executed under the Trump administration, with Trump taking a prominent role in what became his long-desired military spectacle [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question omits several crucial pieces of context:
- The parade's transformation: While the Biden administration issued the initial permit, the event evolved significantly after Trump's election victory. What began as an Army 250th anniversary celebration became Trump's long-sought military parade [1] [3].
- Political implications: The parade raised concerns among former officials about the politicization of the military and potential damage to public trust in the institution [4]. This suggests that different political actors had varying motivations for supporting or opposing the event.
- Protest preparations: The event generated significant opposition, with protesters preparing counter-demonstrations, indicating the controversial nature of the military display [2].
- Historical significance vs. political spectacle: Some analyses framed the parade as a display of civics and the Army's commitment to core values and apolitical service [5], while others emphasized Trump's personal desire for a grand military pageant [3].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question, while technically accurate about the permit timing, potentially misleads by implying Biden administration responsibility for what became Trump's signature military parade. The question focuses narrowly on the permit issuance date without acknowledging that:
- The Biden administration's permit was for a different version of the event than what ultimately occurred
- The parade's character and political significance changed substantially under Trump's direction
- Framing the question this way could serve to either credit or blame the Biden administration for an event that became closely associated with Trump's political agenda
Political actors who might benefit from emphasizing Biden's role in the permit process include Trump supporters seeking to deflect criticism of the parade's politicization, or Biden critics attempting to implicate the former president in what some viewed as an inappropriate military display.