Fact check: What was the estimated cost of the proposed military parade under the Biden administration?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, there appears to be a significant factual error in the original question. The sources consistently indicate that the $45 million military parade was proposed and estimated under the Trump administration, not the Biden administration ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]}.

The cost breakdown for this parade included:

• $16 million allocated specifically for potential road repairs in Washington, D.C. due to damage from military vehicles ^{[1] [2]}
• Additional expenses for soldiers' meals, overtime pay for D.C. officers, and helicopter deployment costs ^[2]
• Costs associated with deploying military vehicles and aircraft ^[3]

The Army's Office of the Chief of Public Affairs confirmed the $45 million estimate ^[4], and the Pentagon indicated that taxpayers would foot this bill ^[6]. The Army took protective measures for the streets to minimize damage from tanks ^[5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial context about the political and social opposition to this parade. The analyses reveal that:

• "No Kings" protesters across the U.S. actively opposed the parade, viewing it as an inappropriate display of power ^[5]
• There was significant debate about both the financial and political costs of such a military display ^[6]
• The parade generated controversy beyond just its price tag, with critics questioning the appropriateness of such displays in a democratic society

Additionally, the analyses mention $134 million in additional costs for Marine and National Guard deployments in Los Angeles ^[6], suggesting the total military expenditure during this period was substantially higher than just the parade costs.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains a fundamental factual error by attributing the military parade proposal to the Biden administration when all sources indicate it was a Trump administration initiative. This misattribution could be:

• An honest mistake about presidential timelines
• Intentional misinformation designed to associate Biden with controversial military spending
• A confusion stemming from partisan media coverage that may have deliberately obscured the timeline

The question's framing also omits the significant controversy and public opposition that surrounded this parade proposal, presenting it as a neutral policy question rather than acknowledging it was a highly contested political decision that sparked nationwide protests ^{[5] [6]}.