Fact check: Did Biden approve the Army's 250th Birthday Parade

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, there is no evidence that Biden approved the Army's 250th Birthday Parade. The sources examined do not contain any information about Biden's involvement in approving this specific event ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}.

Instead, the most recent sources from June 2025 indicate that President Trump was the central figure in the Army's 250th Birthday celebration, delivering remarks and participating in what was described as an "Iconic Grand Parade" ^[2]. The event appears to have taken place during Trump's presidency, not Biden's, based on the White House source describing "President Trump Celebrates U.S. Army's 250th Birthday" ^[2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial temporal context - it doesn't specify which presidency or time period is being referenced. The analyses reveal that:

• The Army's 250th Birthday celebration occurred in June 2025, during Trump's presidency, not Biden's ^[2]
• There were significant concerns about the politicization of the military surrounding this event, with officials worried about the military's apolitical nature being at risk ^[1]
• The celebration took place at Fort Bragg and involved Trump delivering a speech ^[1]

The question appears to be based on an incorrect premise about who was president during the Army's 250th Birthday celebration. Military officials and political observers would benefit from clarifying the timeline and actual decision-makers involved in approving such events.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains a fundamental factual error by attributing the approval to Biden when the available evidence shows Trump was president during the Army's 250th Birthday celebration in June 2025 ^[2]. This misattribution could stem from:

• Confusion about presidential timelines and which administration was in power during specific events
• Deliberate misinformation attempting to either credit or blame Biden for an event he wasn't involved in
• Outdated assumptions about who would be president during the Army's milestone anniversary

The question's framing also ignores the significant controversy surrounding the event's politicization, which military officials identified as a threat to the Army's traditionally apolitical stance ^[1]. This omission removes important context about the concerns raised by military leadership regarding the celebration's political implications.