Fact check: How much of the army anniversary celebration was approved by Biden

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, none of the sources contain any information about Biden approving an army anniversary celebration. The sources analyzed cover various topics related to military affairs and Biden's presidency, but they do not address the specific question about presidential approval of an army anniversary celebration.

The sources do mention the Army's 250th birthday celebration ^{[1] [2]}, but they focus on concerns about military politicization rather than approval processes. Other sources discuss Biden's involvement in various military-related events, including Memorial Day speeches ^{[3] [4]} and D-Day anniversary commemorations ^[5], but these are separate ceremonial events, not army anniversary celebrations requiring presidential approval.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question assumes that Biden had a role in approving an army anniversary celebration, but the analyses reveal several important missing contexts:

• Military ceremony protocols: The sources do not explain the typical approval process for military anniversary celebrations or whether presidential approval is standard procedure for such events ^{[1] [2]}.
• Distinction between events: The analyses show Biden participated in various military commemorative events like Memorial Day ceremonies ^{[3] [4]} and D-Day anniversaries ^[5], but these are different from army anniversary celebrations.
• Current military concerns: The sources highlight that military leaders are focused on maintaining the military's apolitical nature and addressing political turmoil straining the Army during its milestone birthday ^{[1] [2]}, which may be more relevant context than approval processes.
• Administrative priorities: Some sources discuss Biden's focus on other military-related matters, such as security assistance to Ukraine ^[6] and defense budget requests ^[7], which might provide context about his military-related decision-making priorities.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains a fundamental assumption that may be incorrect - that Biden had a specific role in approving an army anniversary celebration. The analyses suggest this premise is not supported by available information:

• Unsupported premise: None of the sources confirm that Biden was involved in approving any army anniversary celebration ^{[1] [2] [8] [9] [6] [7] [3] [5] [4]}.
• Conflation of events: The question may be conflating different types of military ceremonies and commemorations, as the sources show Biden's involvement in Memorial Day events ^{[3] [4]} and historical anniversary commemorations ^[5] rather than army anniversary celebrations specifically.
• Lack of factual basis: The question appears to be based on an assumption rather than established facts, as no source provides evidence of Biden's approval role in such celebrations.

The question itself may reflect a misunderstanding of presidential involvement in military ceremonial events or may be based on incomplete or inaccurate information about specific army anniversary celebrations.