How does Biden’s clemency record on drug offenses compare to previous presidents (Trump, Obama, Clinton)?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
President Biden’s clemency record on drug offenses is historically large in scale: he commuted nearly 2,500 sentences for nonviolent drug offenses in a single action and, by his account, has issued more individual pardons and commutations than any prior president [1] [2] [3]. By contrast, Barack Obama focused heavily on commutations for drug offenders across his presidency (notably 1,715 commutations), Donald Trump granted far fewer clemencies overall and emphasized high‑profile pardons, and Bill Clinton’s clemency slate was smaller though controversial in select cases [4] [5] [6].
1. Biden’s scale and targets: mass commutations aimed at sentencing disparities
Biden’s late‑term actions included commuting nearly 2,500 sentences for people convicted of nonviolent drug offenses with the explicit rationale of redressing crack‑powder cocaine disparities and outdated sentencing enhancements, and the White House framed the moves as correcting decades‑long injustices [1] [2] [7]. Several outlets characterized the single‑day action as the largest modern‑era use of clemency in one day and emphasized the focus on nonviolent, often long‑serving federal drug sentences [8] [1] [7].
2. Obama’s “deep” commutations: fewer people but often greater sentence reductions
Obama’s clemency record, long held as the modern benchmark, involved a heavy emphasis on commutations for nonviolent drug offenders, with about 1,715 commutations and significant single‑day grants (including 330 commutations on his last full day in office), a pattern that reform advocates praised and critics said risked usurping Congress’s role on sentencing policy [9] [6] [10]. Analysts at the time described Obama’s grants as “deep” because many recipients were still serving long terms and received substantial sentence reductions [11].
3. Trump and Clinton: different priorities, fewer drug‑focused commutations
Trump’s overall clemency tally in his first term was low compared with recent presidents, and his grants skewed toward high‑profile pardons and politically connected figures rather than mass commutations for drug sentences; only two other 20th/21st‑century presidents (the Bushes) granted fewer clemency acts than Trump in a comparable span [6] [5] [12]. Bill Clinton issued fewer total commutations focused on drug policy, but his last‑day pardons — notably Marc Rich and also pardoning a family member — drew bipartisan criticism, illustrating that controversy rather than volume often defined prior presidents’ clemency headlines [6].
4. Quantitative comparison and the new baseline
Public reporting and Justice Department tallies presented Biden’s cumulative total of pardons and commutations as surpassing Obama’s prior modern record, with outlets reporting Biden shortened sentences of nearly 2,500 people for nonviolent drug offenses and having issued more individual acts of clemency than any U.S. president [5] [1] [2]. Secondary compilations echo that Biden’s clemency count exceeded Obama’s 1,927 total clemency actions, while Trump’s and Clinton’s numbers were much lower [4] [12] [10].
5. Differences in approach: breadth vs. depth, policy framing, and politics
Beyond raw counts, Biden’s approach is characterized as broad but sometimes “shallow” — many recipients were already on home confinement or would have benefited from recent reforms, so the immediate practical gains for some were limited — whereas Obama’s clemencies were noted for deeper sentence reductions affecting people still in custody [11]. Politically, Biden framed his actions as correcting racialized sentencing laws that he himself helped shape decades earlier, an implicit admission of policy responsibility and a motive that reform advocates welcomed while critics pointed to perceived conflicts and controversial individual pardons [13] [2] [6].
6. Alternative viewpoints and limits of reporting
Supporters cast Biden’s mass commutations as corrective, addressing the disproportionate impact of the War on Drugs and aligning with evolving public sentiment on nonviolent drug punishment, while opponents argue some grants undermine legislative sentencing prerogatives or raise questions about selectivity and process; reporting flags that presidential clemency has long generated controversy across administrations [1] [6] [5]. Available sources document counts and political reactions but do not allow a full assessment of long‑term outcomes for recipients or a granular, case‑by‑case legal analysis beyond what the White House and major outlets reported [2] [7].