Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Did Biden’s daughters write about being sexually abused by him
Executive summary
Available reporting shows one prominent allegation that a Biden staffer, Tara Reade, accused Joe Biden of sexual assault in 1993; separate reporting and fact-checking have documented a leaked diary attributed to Ashley Biden that references being "hyper-sexualized" and mentions showers with her father as "probably not appropriate," but major outlets and fact-checkers treat the diary material as unverified and Project Veritas' role in its handling has been reported [1] [2]. Fringe sites have pushed claims that Ashley explicitly accused her father of repeated child sexual abuse; those sensational claims are not corroborated by mainstream reporting in the provided sources [3] [2].
1. What the mainstream reporting documents: Tara Reade’s allegation
In 2020 Tara Reade, who worked in Senator Biden’s office in 1993, publicly alleged that Biden sexually assaulted her in a Capitol hallway; outlets including BBC, TIME and PBS reported her account and Biden’s denial, noting she is the only woman who has accused him of sexual assault though several women described him as "touchy-feely" [1] [4] [5]. Reporting emphasizes differences between claims of inappropriate touching and a criminal sexual assault allegation, and notes investigators and journalists examined Reade’s credibility as part of coverage [6] [4].
2. What’s reported about Ashley Biden’s diary and its contents
A document circulated online and sold to conservative outlets purported to be Ashley Biden’s diary; some pages reportedly mention sexual trauma, being “hyper-sexualized @ a young age,” and a line saying showers with her father were “probably not appropriate.” Snopes reports the diary’s contents have not been authenticated and that while there is strong circumstantial evidence a diary exists, its pages have not been verified by major news organizations [2]. The Associated Press and other outlets documented that a Project Veritas employee purchased materials related to the diary, but authentication remains unresolved in the sources provided [2].
3. The presence of politicized and fringe reporting
Extremist or partisan outlets have amplified unverified and sensational claims, including an article asserting Ashley “confirmed” repeated childhood sexual abuse by Joe Biden; that piece appears on a fringe site (The People’s Voice) and is not corroborated by mainstream sources in the packet [3]. Fact-checkers like PolitiFact have previously debunked broader pedophilia-style attacks on Biden as unsubstantiated or doctored; such debunking in the past targets the tactic of circulating dated or manipulated images and claims without corroboration [7].
4. How major outlets frame credibility and context
Major outlets covering Reade’s allegation (BBC, TIME, PBS) treated it as a serious allegation that warranted investigation while also noting gaps: contemporaneous records are limited, Reade’s account evolved over time, and Biden denied the assault and called for any formal complaint to be located [1] [4] [8]. Reporting also placed the allegation amid conversation about “believe women” and the political stakes of such claims in a presidential campaign [9].
5. What the available sources do not establish
Available sources in this collection do not establish that either of Biden’s daughters — Ashley or the other daughter referenced in fringe reports — publicly wrote or otherwise authenticated an account explicitly stating Joe Biden repeatedly sexually abused them as children. Sources do not show mainstream confirmation that Ashley’s diary conclusively proves abuse by her father; Snopes says the diary pages have not been authenticated and reporting notes unresolved provenance and handling [2]. The sensational claim that Ashley "confirmed" repeated child sexual abuse appears only in fringe reporting and is not corroborated here [3] [2].
6. How to read competing narratives and motives
Mainstream outlets documented a single, contemporarily reported claim (the 1993 Larry King call linked to Reade’s mother) and later public allegations by Reade; they pursued standard verification questions about memory, witnesses and records [4]. Conversely, partisan actors and some alternative-media outlets have promoted unverified diary pages and dramatic headlines that serve political narratives; Project Veritas’ purchase and the diary’s circulation complicate provenance and suggest possible partisan motives in publicizing leaked materials [2]. Readers should treat unverified diary excerpts and fringe-site leaps to definitive conclusions as politically loaded and not settled by the reporting assembled here.
Conclusion: The provided reporting confirms Tara Reade’s public allegation against Joe Biden and documents the existence of leaked diary pages attributed to Ashley Biden that mention sexual trauma, but it does not provide authenticated, mainstream confirmation that Biden’s daughters wrote that their father repeatedly sexually abused them; sensational claims appear primarily in fringe sources and remain unverified in the sources cited [1] [2] [3].