Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What specific denials or confirmations has President Biden made about the diary allegations?
Executive summary
President Biden himself has not been quoted in the provided reporting as directly denying or confirming any specific allegations drawn from Ashley Biden’s stolen diary; instead, court filings, fact‑check updates, and reporting document that Ashley Biden has acknowledged the diary’s existence and the criminal prosecutions around its theft (Snopes and Newsweek) [1] [2]. Project Veritas and others who possessed or handled the diary have offered varying accounts about how it was obtained and whether they tried to return it, while legal proceedings have focused on theft and possession rather than public, on‑the‑record denials or confirmations by Joe Biden [3] [4].
1. What the reporting documents about who has spoken: court records and Ashley Biden’s acknowledgement
Reporting and fact checks cited here note that Ashley Biden herself has acknowledged the diary’s existence in court-related filings — for example, Snopes updated its position after Ashley Biden’s letter to a judge and Newsweek summarized that reporting — and prosecutors pursued cases against people who stole or trafficked the diary rather than treating its contents as the primary evidence in litigation [1] [2] [5]. These sources make clear that the public admissions relevant to authenticity came from Ashley Biden and court testimony, not a public statement by President Biden refuting or confirming content allegations [1] [2].
2. What Joe Biden has reportedly said (or not said): available sources do not mention direct presidential denials or confirmations
Available reporting in the provided set does not include any direct quotation of President Biden denying or confirming diary content or specific allegations contained within it. News coverage and fact checks focus on the provenance of the diary, the criminal cases against those who stole or sold it, and the role of Project Veritas; none of these items in the provided selection record Joe Biden issuing a public denial or confirmation of the diary’s detailed claims [2] [4] [3]. Therefore, any claim that President Biden personally denied or confirmed the diary allegations is not documented in these sources: "available sources do not mention" a presidential statement on the diary’s substantive content [2] [4].
3. How fact‑checkers and reporters handled authenticity and content claims
Fact‑check organizations such as Snopes reviewed the chain of custody and available evidence and ultimately adjusted their assessments after Ashley Biden’s court-related letter; Snopes' work and related summaries say there is "strong circumstantial evidence" the diary belonged to Ashley Biden, but they noted that the contents themselves remained contested and that provenance was a central question [1] [6]. Newsweek and Yahoo/Associated Press coverage likewise outline the theft, prosecution, and reporting history instead of treating the diary’s content as independently verified or as grounds for a presidential admission [2] [7].
4. What Project Veritas and allied actors have claimed — and how that differs from presidential comment
Project Veritas figures and affiliated reporting have offered competing narratives: James O’Keefe and others said Project Veritas tried to return the diary to lawyers for Ashley Biden and later gave material to law enforcement, while some reporting and court filings allege Project Veritas employees were involved in the chain that led to the diary being sold or published [3] [4]. Those accounts relate to how the diary moved through private hands and media outlets; the provided reporting frames this as an evidentiary and legal question rather than an instance where President Biden publicly confirmed or denied its contents [3] [4].
5. Legal outcomes and emphasis: theft and trafficking, not adjudication of diary claims
The criminal cases discussed in the sources resulted in guilty pleas and sentences for people who stole or transported the diary; prosecutors sought to investigate the chain of custody and related documents [5] [4]. The journalistic emphasis across these items is on criminality around the diary’s theft and on whether outlets or actors had a legal or ethical obligation to return it, not on a court‑tested ruling about the diary’s allegations or on a presidential statement confirming or refuting them [5] [4].
6. What remains unclear from these sources and why that matters
The provided reporting does not include any direct quote from President Biden addressing the diary’s specific allegations, so readers should treat claims about his personal denials or confirmations as unsupported by these sources: "available sources do not mention" such a presidential response [1] [2]. The reporting does document provenance debates, legal outcomes for people who stole the diary, and Ashley Biden’s own acknowledgment in court filings — all of which shape public understanding even in the absence of a presidential statement [1] [5].
Bottom line: the accessible articles and fact checks focus on the diary’s provenance, legal consequences for those who took or handled it, and Ashley Biden’s court-related acknowledgement; they do not record President Biden personally denying or confirming the diary’s substantive accusations [1] [2] [5].