Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Why didn’t Biden release the Epstein files?
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The original statement questions why Biden did not release the Epstein files. However, upon reviewing the analyses provided, it appears that there is no direct evidence to suggest that Biden had the opportunity to release the Epstein files or that he chose not to [1]. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has released records provided by the estate of Jeffrey Epstein [2] and 33,295 pages of Epstein-related records provided by the U.S. Department of Justice [3]. Additionally, some Democratic lawmakers, including Representative Lois Frankel and Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, have been seeking the release of Epstein records since 2019 [4]. The Justice Department has also agreed to provide Congress with documents from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation [5] and has conducted an exhaustive review of investigative holdings related to Jeffrey Epstein [6]. The release of Epstein files has been a complex issue involving multiple parties and interests [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key missing context in the original statement is the role of the Justice Department in releasing the Epstein files [6]. The department has prioritized protecting victims and combating child exploitation, and has stated that it will not permit the release of child pornography [6]. Another missing context is the efforts of Democratic lawmakers to release Epstein records [1] [4]. Representative Lois Frankel and Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz have launched a years-long quest to release Epstein records [1]. Alternative viewpoints include the possibility that the issue is complex and involves multiple parties and interests [4], and that the Justice Department has been working to provide Congress with documents from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation [5]. The release of 33,000 pages of Epstein files by a US congressional panel is also an important context [7], which contained little new information and it is unclear if the justice department is withholding other Epstein records.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement implies that Biden had the opportunity to release the Epstein files and chose not to. However, there is no direct evidence to support this claim [1]. This framing may benefit those who seek to criticize Biden's handling of the Epstein case, but it does not accurately reflect the complexity of the issue [4]. The statement also overlooks the efforts of Democratic lawmakers to release Epstein records [1] [4] and the role of the Justice Department in releasing the Epstein files [6]. This omission may be beneficial to those who seek to portray Democrats as uninterested in Epstein case transparency [4], but it is not supported by the evidence. The original statement may be considered misleading [1], as it does not provide a complete or accurate picture of the situation.