Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Did the biden admin spend billions on 8 charging stations

Checked on January 6, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The claim about the Biden administration spending billions on just 8 charging stations is demonstrably false. The actual situation is:

  • $7.5 billion was allocated (not spent) through the 2021 Infrastructure and Jobs Act for a national EV charging network [1]
  • As of December 2024, there are 37 charging stations with 226 charging ports operational across 13 states [1]
  • There are currently 24,800 projects in various stages of development [2]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:

  • The funding is split between two distinct programs:
  • $5 billion for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program
  • $2.5 billion for the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant Program [1]
  • This is a long-term infrastructure project extending through 2030, with most chargers planned for construction in the second half of the 2020s [1]
  • The program's initial slow rollout was due to the complexity of coordinating implementation across 50 states, with state plans only receiving approval in September 2022 [3]
  • The funding is being distributed to states over several years (2022-2030), with states responsible for actual implementation [1]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement appears to be deliberately misleading in several ways:

  • It conflates allocation with spending, suggesting the money has already been spent when it's actually being distributed over many years [1]
  • It dramatically understates the number of existing charging stations and completely ignores the thousands of projects in development
  • Secretary Pete Buttigieg has explicitly addressed these claims as false [1]
  • The statement ignores the federal-state partnership aspect of the program, where states are responsible for implementation rather than direct federal construction [1]

This type of misinformation could benefit those opposing the Biden administration's clean energy initiatives or those seeking to portray government spending as wasteful, while ignoring the actual scope and progress of the infrastructure program.

Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?