How many executive orders did Joe Biden sign in 2024 and which ones used an autopen?
Executive summary
Federal records show President Biden signed 19 executive orders in 2024 (EO 14115 through EO 14133) [1]. Multiple news outlets and committee materials report controversy over which Biden-era documents were signed with an autopen, but available sources do not provide a definitive, sourced list of which specific 2024 executive orders were signed by autopen [1] [2] [3].
1. The hard count: 19 executive orders in 2024
The Federal Register’s compilation for 2024 lists 19 executive orders issued by Joseph R. Biden, Jr., numbered EO 14115 through EO 14133 [1]. That official tally is the baseline for any further inquiry into the provenance of signatures and the legal status of those instruments [1].
2. What an autopen is and how it has been used historically
News accounts and experts note autopens are mechanical signature-reproduction devices long used by presidents to affix signatures when physically unavailable; Justice Department advice has previously treated autopen use as legally permissible when authorized by the president [4] [5]. Reporting also emphasizes that both Democratic and Republican administrations have used autopens, sometimes for legislation or routine items, and that the device’s historical use is not new [5] [4].
3. Reporting on Biden’s autopen use: known examples, not a comprehensive list
Coverage cited by major outlets shows Biden used an autopen in at least some instances while traveling—for example, to sign a funding extension for federal aviation programs in 2024, according to CNN reporting cited by NBC — but those accounts do not map every affected executive order in 2024 [2]. Thus while there are specific reported instances of autopen use, available sources do not list which of the 19 2024 EOs, if any, were autopen-signed in whole or in part [2].
4. The political fight: claims, counterclaims and investigations
Since mid-2025, Republican officials and President Trump have declared they will nullify documents they allege were autopen-signed and have accused Biden aides of improper use; outlets including CBS, CNN, PBS and Al Jazeera document those assertions and the ensuing rhetoric [6] [3] [5] [7]. Congressional Republican investigations and committee reports have alleged autopen misuse and raised questions about authorization for clemency and other major acts [8] [9]. Independent reporting and opinion pieces note partisan motivations and that conclusions about unauthorized signatures have not been uniformly established [10].
5. Legal context: permissibility vs. provenance
The Justice Department’s past guidance (2005 OLC opinion referenced in reporting) has allowed autopen use for presidential signatures when properly authorized by the president; several outlets cite that precedent to question sweeping claims that autopen use automatically voids actions [4] [11]. Conversely, Republican investigators argue that if autopen signatures were used without contemporaneous, traceable written authorization by the president, legal challenges could follow; that is a factual claim under investigation rather than a settled legal outcome in the sources [4] [6].
6. What the sources do and do not establish about 2024 EOs
Federal Register data establishes there were 19 EOs in 2024 but does not indicate signing method [1]. Contemporary news reporting documents autopen use in some contexts and intensifying scrutiny, but available sources do not publish a verified, itemized list tying specific 2024 executive orders (EO 14115–14133) to autopen signatures [1] [2] [3]. Therefore any claim that X number of those 19 were autopen-signed is not corroborated in the material provided.
7. Competing narratives and hidden agendas to watch
Republican investigators and President Trump frame autopen reporting as evidence of a cover-up and seek to invalidate many Biden actions; media outlets and legal commentators stress the long-standing, legally accepted use of autopens and note partisan incentives in the Oversight narrative [9] [10]. Readers should treat aggressive numerical assertions from partisan sources (for example, claims that “92%” of Biden’s orders were autopen-signed) as partisan framing unless tied to primary-document, item-by-item evidence — such evidence is not present in these sources [12] [7].
8. Takeaway and next steps for verification
The concrete facts in the record: 19 executive orders in 2024 [1]. The disputed facts — which of those, if any, were signed by autopen without proper authorization — remain the subject of political claims and investigations; the sources provided do not contain a definitive, sourced checklist linking specific 2024 EOs to autopen signatures [1] [2] [3]. For conclusive answers, request release of contemporaneous White House signing logs, internal authorization memos, or a department-level legal opinion tied to each contested document — items that are not in the current reporting (not found in current reporting).