Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Biden s release of 140 hostages from Hamas

Checked on October 21, 2025

Executive summary

The claim that “Biden’s release of 140 hostages from Hamas” is not supported by the available reporting; contemporary accounts document hostage releases tied to negotiated deals involving Israel, Hamas, and the United States but do not attribute a release of 140 hostages to President Biden. Reporting from October to December 2025 documents specific exchanges and mentions U.S. involvement in mediation and proposals tied to then-President Trump’s plan, but none of the supplied sources corroborate the numeric figure or credit Biden as the actor responsible [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. Why the headline sounds definitive — and why the documents don’t back it up

The claim compresses several factual elements — U.S. involvement in negotiations, hostage releases, and public political claims — into a single, simple statement. The supplied materials establish that hostage releases occurred under negotiated arrangements and that the U.S. engaged diplomatically, often through indirect talks in Egypt; however, no supplied source documents a release of “140 hostages” orchestrated by President Biden. Instead, reporting cites specific numbers far lower or emphasizes deals brokered around a ceasefire framework, showing a mismatch between the claim and contemporaneous accounts [2] [3].

2. What the most concrete counts actually say about released hostages

Contemporaneous reporting gives concrete, much smaller counts: one source notes 20 surviving Israeli hostages freed in an exchange, and another highlights the release of Edan Alexander as the last living American hostage freed after a deal between Hamas and the United States. These pieces describe negotiated exchanges and focused repatriations rather than a single mass release of 140 people credited to Biden. The numerical evidence in the supplied reporting therefore contradicts the 140 figure and the attribution in the original claim [3] [1].

3. Who the reporting credits with shaping the deals — and where Biden appears (or doesn’t)

Across these reports, the diplomatic architecture is repeatedly described as multilateral and often tied to proposals attributed to President Trump or to indirect talks involving Israel, Hamas, and mediators in Egypt. Several accounts explicitly frame the agreements as deriving from or aligned with a Trump-backed plan, and they document U.S. involvement without naming Biden as the principal negotiator responsible for a 140-hostage release. The supplied analyses therefore suggest other political actors and plans played central roles in the documented exchanges [4] [2].

4. Timing and sourcing: what the dates and publication notes reveal about the narrative

The supplied items span October to December 2025, a period when ceasefire and hostage-exchange negotiations were active and subject to rapid developments. October pieces report indirect talks and frameworks for prisoner swaps, while December coverage records individual releases such as the last living American hostage. The temporal pattern in these sources shows incremental, verifiable releases rather than a single, large-scale handover attributable to one American president, undermining the specific claim about Biden and 140 hostages [2] [1].

5. Possible reasons for the discrepancy and political framing to watch for

Misattribution can arise from conflating multilateral diplomatic involvement with sole presidential action, or from amplified partisan messaging that credits or blames a sitting president for outcomes produced by broader negotiations. The supplied analyses contain hints of political framing, including explicit references to a Trump plan and reporting emphasis on indirect talks; these cues suggest the original claim may reflect partisan narrative construction rather than a factual account verified by contemporaneous reporting [4] [2].

6. Bottom line: what can be stated as fact and what remains unproven

Fact: negotiated hostage releases occurred in late 2025 and involved U.S. mediation, Israel, Hamas, and mediators in Egypt; named releases include the last living American hostage and documented exchanges freeing dozens, not 140 [1] [3] [2]. Unproven/false: that President Biden personally “released 140 hostages from Hamas.” That specific numeric claim and direct attribution to Biden are unsupported by the supplied evidence and appear to contradict the contemporaneous reporting [1] [4].

7. Suggested accurate formulations and what to verify before repeating the claim

Before repeating the original phrasing, verify three elements in primary reporting: the number of hostages released, the mechanism of release (which parties signed or implemented the deal), and the actor credited with achieving the release. A defensible statement would say that “hostage releases occurred as part of negotiated exchanges involving Hamas, Israel, and U.S. mediation in late 2025,” while avoiding asserting a precise number or crediting President Biden unless corroborated by primary reporting [3] [2] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What were the terms of the hostage release deal between the US and Hamas?
How many American hostages were released by Hamas in the deal?
What role did international mediators play in the Biden administration's negotiations with Hamas?
How has the release of hostages affected US policy towards Gaza and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
What are the potential implications of the hostage release for Biden's foreign policy legacy?