Fact check: Did Biden and Harris invite and bring illegals here

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, there is no direct evidence that Biden and Harris explicitly "invited and brought illegals" to the United States. The sources reveal a more nuanced picture of immigration policy implementation rather than deliberate invitation of unauthorized immigration.

The analyses show that:

• Biden's immigration policies have been implemented through established legal frameworks, including parole programs that allow up to 30,000 people from certain countries to enter monthly if they apply online with a financial sponsor and arrive at specified airports ^[1]
• The Biden administration has maintained border security measures, including suspension and limitation of entry for certain noncitizens at the southern border due to high encounter numbers ^[2]
• Claims about secretly flying migrants into the country have been fact-checked as unfounded, as the transportation occurs through official parole programs rather than clandestine operations ^[1]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several critical pieces of context that emerge from the analyses:

• Legal immigration pathways exist - Biden's policies have focused on easing processes for eligible noncitizens to obtain lawful permanent residence, but do not grant citizenship to undocumented immigrants ^[3]
• Border security enforcement continues - The administration has implemented measures to suspend and limit entry when encounter numbers strain the immigration system ^[2]
• Policy criticism vs. direct invitation - While sources document criticism of Biden-Harris border policies leading to increased illegal immigration, they distinguish between policy consequences and deliberate invitation ^{[4] [5]}

Political actors who benefit from different narratives include:

• Republican lawmakers and committees who gain political advantage by framing immigration policy failures as deliberate invitation of illegal immigration ^{[4] [5]}
• Democratic officials who benefit from portraying their policies as humanitarian and legally compliant rather than as encouraging illegal entry

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains several problematic elements:

• Loaded terminology - The use of "illegals" is dehumanizing language that frames the discussion in biased terms from the outset
• False binary assumption - The question assumes a direct causal relationship between Biden-Harris actions and unauthorized immigration without acknowledging the complexity of immigration policy implementation
• Lack of distinction between policy consequences and intent - The analyses show that while critics argue Biden-Harris policies have led to increased illegal immigration, this is different from deliberately "inviting and bringing" unauthorized immigrants ^[4]
• Omission of legal immigration programs - The question ignores that many of the administration's actions involve legal pathways for immigration, including parole programs with specific requirements and oversight ^{[1] [3]}

The framing suggests a predetermined conclusion rather than an objective inquiry into immigration policy implementation and outcomes.