Biden pardons number
Executive summary
President Biden’s clemency actions from 2021–2025 include thousands of commutations (2,490 in a January 17, 2025 batch alone) and large-scale pardons by proclamation for classes like federal simple marijuana possession; independent analysis counts 4,245 acts of clemency across his term (Pew) [1] [2]. Reporting and official lists show dozens of individual pardons and hundreds of commutations, but numbers vary by metric (pardons vs. commutations vs. proclamations) and by whether class-wide proclamations are counted [3] [2] [1].
1. Biden’s raw clemency figures: separate buckets, different totals
The Justice Department and White House releases distinguish pardons, commutations and proclamations; for example, the White House published a January 17, 2025 list commuting 2,490 individuals [1]. Pew’s analysis—based largely on Justice Department data—sums 4,245 acts of clemency across Biden’s four-year term, noting that the DOJ’s own statistics don’t always count pardons issued to whole classes by proclamation [2] [3]. That helps explain why single-source totals can look inconsistent: proclamations that pardon classes (marijuana possession, for instance) may be tabulated differently [2].
2. Big, headline actions that changed the math
Biden used proclamations to pardon people convicted of certain federal marijuana offenses (October 2022 and December 2023), actions that affected thousands and complicate simple “how many pardons” headlines because they are class-wide rather than one-by-one entries [2] [3]. Separate, high-profile individual clemency moves late in his term — including preemptive pardons and pardons for family members and advisers — drew intense attention and influenced perception of the overall count [4] [5].
3. How news outlets and watchdogs counted differently
Mainstream outlets reported both discrete pardon totals (e.g., “65 pardons” in some lists) and far larger totals when including commutations and class proclamations; Fox and other local outlets listed 65 named pardons while other reporting emphasized the thousands affected by class actions and commutations [6] [1]. Pew’s cross-presidential comparison aggregated acts of clemency into a single figure to compare with historical presidencies, while the DOJ’s site separates the actions by date and type [2] [3].
4. Legal and political controversy over signature method and validity
After Biden left office, political opponents questioned the validity of some pardons, alleging use of an autopen; Trump announced he would “terminate” documents he said Biden autopen-signed, but legal experts and fact-checkers note courts would have to decide invalidity and DOJ records and analyses are the primary sources for counting clemency acts [7] [8]. Reporting also shows House Republican probes and partisan commentary that cast pardons as political or corrupt — a point emphasized by Rep. James Comer and Oversight materials — while legal scholars stress the constitutional and judicial mechanisms that govern clemency disputes [9] [10].
5. What the numbers actually reflect — and what they don’t
Raw totals can mask differences in severity, remedy type and eligibility: commutations shorten or end prison terms (as with the 2,490 commutations announced January 17, 2025), while pardons erase legal penalties or prevent prosecution for specified federal crimes; proclamations can relieve entire classes [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention a single universally accepted “Biden pardons number” because federal reporting separates categories and independent analyses choose different inclusion rules [3] [2].
6. Competing narratives and what to watch next
Supporters frame Biden’s clemency record as historic criminal-justice reform and corrective action on disparities; critics label late-term, preemptive and family pardons as politically motivated and possibly subject to legal challenge [2] [5] [9]. The credibility of each narrative depends on which counts you accept (individual pardons vs. class proclamations vs. commutations) and on future court rulings or DOJ determinations about disputed signatures — developments that could change legal status but not the published archival lists [8] [3].
Limitations: this piece uses only the provided reporting and official lists; sources differ in counting methods, and available sources do not resolve a single canonical total because of those methodological differences [3] [2] [1].