Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Did Biden take taxpayer funded golf trips
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, Biden did take taxpayer-funded trips, but the evidence for specifically golf-related trips is limited. The sources reveal that Biden made 76 trips to Delaware, costing taxpayers at least $11 million in flights alone, with security costs adding millions more [1] [2].
However, the analyses show that Biden has been a regular at Fieldstone Golf Club during his presidency, visiting the club at least 22 times as president [3]. The sources also confirm that Biden golfs with his brother James Biden [4], indicating that golf is indeed part of his recreational activities.
The analyses consistently note that while Biden takes taxpayer-funded trips and does play golf, there is no direct evidence explicitly connecting taxpayer-funded travel specifically for golf purposes.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks important comparative context that emerges from the analyses. Trump's golf trips are extensively documented as costing taxpayers significant amounts, with sources mentioning Trump spending $10 million of taxpayer money to promote his Scotland golf course [5] and discussing Trump's golf trips and their costs to taxpayers [5].
The analyses reveal a pattern where presidential recreational activities routinely involve taxpayer costs, regardless of the specific president. The sources describe Biden's Delaware trips as "beach retreats" alongside Trump's golf trips, suggesting both presidents' recreational travel impacts taxpayers [1] [2].
Missing from the original question is acknowledgment that all presidential travel, whether for golf, beach visits, or other personal activities, involves taxpayer-funded security and transportation costs. This is standard practice for presidential security requirements, not unique to any particular recreational activity.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains implicit bias by focusing specifically on Biden and golf trips without acknowledging the broader context of presidential travel costs. The analyses show that one source fact-checks a false claim about Joe and Hunter Biden pictured golfing with Burisma CEO [6], indicating there has been misinformation circulating about Biden's golf activities.
The question's framing suggests potential partisan motivation, as it isolates Biden's activities without mentioning that all presidents incur taxpayer costs for recreational travel. The analyses demonstrate that Trump's golf-related taxpayer expenses are well-documented and substantial [5] [7], yet the original question doesn't seek this comparative context.
The question also conflates general taxpayer-funded travel with specifically golf-purposed trips, when the analyses show that while Biden travels at taxpayer expense and does play golf, the connection between taxpayer funding and golf-specific travel is not definitively established in the available sources.