Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How do the deportation numbers under the Biden administration compare to Trump's numbers since 2021?
Executive Summary
The available analyses indicate deportations under President Biden through 2024 exceeded levels seen during President Trump’s first term and hit a decade high in fiscal 2024, with reporting that the Biden years saw millions of removals/returns versus lower totals under Trump’s initial term [1] [2] [3]. Observers attribute the higher totals to administration enforcement choices focused on recent border crossers, pandemic-era authorities and record border arrivals, while advocates warn numbers omit distinctions between removals and returns and reflect shifting priorities [1] [4] [2].
1. What the competing claims actually say — pulling the claims into view
Analysts assert that Biden-era deportations have been larger in absolute terms than Trump-era totals in comparable spans, with one January 2025 piece citing roughly four million deportations during Biden’s tenure compared with 1.9 million in Trump’s first term, and multiple outlets reporting a 2024 ICE peak of about 271,000 [1] [2] [3]. Other reporting frames the Biden totals as over 1.1 million removals and returns since FY2021, and notes Trump-era policy emphasis on expanding arrests and expedited removal tools, signaling different enforcement strategies and goals [4] [5].
2. The most recent, concrete datapoints — fiscal-year peaks and decade highs
Fiscal-year reporting shows ICE removals/returns reached roughly 271,000 in fiscal 2024, described as a ten-year high and surpassing the Trump-era peaks in single-year comparisons [2] [3]. Broader cumulative tallies cited in major summaries give totals in the low millions for the Biden years depending on whether one aggregates removals, returns and expulsions under Title 42-era or pandemic authorities — figures that vary by definitional choices used in reporting [1] [4].
3. How the administrations’ numbers compare when you aggregate different measures
Comparisons hinge on definitions: counting removals (formal deportations) plus returns/expulsions produces larger cumulative Biden-era figures cited by journalists; one article sums roughly four million during Biden versus 1.9 million in Trump’s first term, while other analyses count 1.1 million removals/returns since 2021 depending on data scope [1] [4]. Trump-era reporting emphasized daily ICE arrests and expanded expedited removal nationwide, making single-year and operational comparisons meaningful but not directly comparable without consistent categories [5].
4. Why numbers rose under Biden — operational choices and external drivers
Reporting attributes Biden-era increases to two linked factors: operational focus on recent border crossers and use of emergency or pandemic-era authorities to expedite departures, and the external reality of record border encounters that produced higher enforcement volumes in practice [1] [2] [3]. Journalists also note that returns are cheaper and quicker than interior removals, so shifting to border-focused priorities can raise totals even without major interior enforcement increases [4].
5. What critics and proponents emphasize — different narratives, different agendas
Proponents of stricter enforcement point to rising deportation totals as evidence the administration is responding to illegal crossings and restoring deterrence, noting decade-high ICE activity in 2024 [2] [3]. Critics counter that aggregating returns/expulsions with formal removals can obscure the human costs and legal differences, and warn that public framing serves political aims ahead of clearer, standardized data releases [1] [4]. Both sides use selective figures to support policy arguments.
6. Limits of the public data — definitions, timeframes and omitted details
All comparisons are constrained by inconsistent definitions (removals vs returns vs expulsions), shifting authorities (Title 42/pandemic rules), and differing timeframes; a cumulative “four million” figure depends on whether returns and expedited expulsions are included, while annual ICE counts like 271,000 reflect a specific fiscal-year metric [1] [2]. Court challenges to expedited removal expansions and future policy changes will further complicate apples-to-apples comparisons over multi-year spans [5] [6].
7. What to watch next — incoming policy promises and economic analyses
Recent reporting notes the incoming Trump administration plans large-scale deportation initiatives and has pledged up to a million deportations per year, a level that would exceed recent peaks and create major economic dislocation per analyses modeling workforce impacts [6] [7]. Observers should watch whether new policies expand interior arrests and expedited removals or focus on border flows, because those operational choices will determine whether totals accelerate beyond the Biden-era decade high [5] [8].
8. Bottom line for readers seeking a fair comparison
The factual bottom line is that Biden-era enforcement produced higher reported totals through 2024 in several widely cited measures — including a fiscal 2024 ICE peak of about 271,000 and cumulative counts in the millions depending on inclusions — while Trump-era policy tools emphasized arrests and legal expansions that complicate direct comparisons. Accurate, long-term comparisons require standardized definitions and clarified data releases; until then, single-year peaks and aggregated totals provide useful but partial perspectives on each administration’s enforcement footprint [2] [1] [4].