Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which administration had a higher deportation rate per year, Biden or Trump?
Executive Summary
The available analyses present conflicting claims about which administration had a higher annual deportation rate: a plurality of syntheses conclude the Biden administration removed more people per year than the Trump administration, while other pieces argue the opposite or highlight different metrics such as interior removals or expulsions [1] [2] [3] [4]. Differences stem from inconsistent counting methods—ICE “removals” versus broader “repatriations” or Title 42 expulsions—and from using different time windows (full fiscal years versus first 100 days or partial multi‑year totals), so any direct comparison must specify which categories and timeframes are being compared [1] [5] [3].
1. Conflicting Claims: Who Says What and Why It Matters
Multiple analyses state that the Biden administration has a higher annual deportation rate, citing totals that include ICE removals plus expulsions and repatriations that, aggregated, produce annual averages above Trump’s four‑year totals [1] [3]. Conversely, several sources argue Trump’s enforcement produced higher rates for some categories—especially interior criminal removals or during certain high‑activity periods—leading to claims that Trump’s per‑year figures exceed Biden’s depending on which removals are counted [4] [6]. These competing claims matter because policy debates and public perceptions hinge on which definition of “deportation” is used: ICE removals with formal orders, voluntary returns, Title 42 expulsions at the border, and administrative repatriations are counted differently across sources [1] [3].
2. The Data Differences That Explain the Disagreement
The datasets diverge in scope: one analysis reports the Biden period (FY2021–Feb 2024) accumulated roughly 1.1 million deportations and 4.4 million repatriations including expulsions, yielding an annualized rate that exceeds Trump-era totals when aggregated [1]. Other writeups highlight ICE-specific removal counts—e.g., roughly 272,000 ICE removals in a single Biden fiscal year (FY2024)—and compare those to Trump-era annual removal averages near 450,000, producing a Trump advantage if expulsions and Title 42 actions are excluded [5] [3]. Additional reports focus on short windows (first 100 days) or interior removals only, producing yet different rankings; one source even frames Trump removals as lower than Biden’s recent daily average in a specific comparison [2].
3. Which Metrics Are Most Relevant to the Question Asked
The user asked specifically about “deportation rate per year,” which requires a defined numerator and denominator: which types of departures count, and which time period constitutes a “year.” When counting all enforced returns including Title 42 expulsions and administrative repatriations, Biden’s multi‑year totals produce a higher annualized rate [1] [3]. When restricting the count to ICE removals only, the picture is mixed: Biden recorded a historically high ICE removal year (FY2024) but Trump’s four‑year removal totals still produce substantial annual averages depending on whether removals and returns are combined [5] [3]. Some analyses emphasize criminal‑case interior removals to argue Trump was tougher on criminal removals, altering the comparison [4].
4. Timeline and Short‑Window Comparisons That Skew Perceptions
Short windows—first 100 days or partial fiscal years—produce volatile comparisons. One analysis compares Biden’s FY2024 daily removal average to a Trump-era 100‑day removal average and concludes Biden’s is higher, while other pieces show Trump’s earlier years averaged more removals per year across a full term [2] [5]. Aggregating different multi‑year spans also shifts outcomes: counting cumulative repatriations across several years inflates Biden’s totals if Title 42 expulsions are heavily represented, while restricting to formal ICE removal orders favors other comparisons [1] [3]. The takeaway is that short windows and mixed timeframes create apparent contradictions that reflect methodological choices, not necessarily incompatible empirical facts [2] [6].
5. Sources, Incentives and What Remains Unclear
The analyses come from entities with differing focuses; some emphasize ICE internal statistics and enforcement capacity and others aggregate broader repatriation metrics that include public‑health expulsions and administrative returns [1] [4] [3]. Several summaries lack full methodological transparency about which categories they include or how they annualize multi‑year totals [2] [7]. That opacity produces divergent headlines and leaves policymakers and readers without a single definitive ranking. A robust answer requires a consistent definition—ICE removals only, removals plus returns, or removals plus expulsions—and a fixed comparison period (a single fiscal year or a full presidential term).
6. Bottom Line: What the Evidence Actually Shows
Using the broader aggregate that includes expulsions and repatriations, multiple analyses conclude the Biden administration’s annualized deportation rate surpasses Trump’s; using narrower ICE removal‑only counts or alternative timeframes can reverse that conclusion [1] [3] [4]. The factual resolution is not a single number but a map of definitions: choose the removal categories and period, and the data will show which administration had the higher rate for that metric [5] [6]. Readers should treat headline claims cautiously and demand clarity about what “deportation” includes before accepting a definitive ranking [2] [4].