What are the photos of Bill Clinton and Trump together like the one in the bedroom and the one of Trump unbuckling Clinton’s pants? What the actual photos and not just AI give me the ones.
Executive summary
Photographs purporting to show Bill Clinton and Donald Trump in intimate or sexual situations—such as images of the two “cuddling in a bed” or of Trump “unbuckling Clinton’s pants”—are not supported by the authenticated photo record released by archives and news outlets; the genuine images that exist show the two men at public events and social gatherings, not in sexual acts, while some viral clips and stills have been demonstrably manipulated with AI or miscaptioned [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. House Oversight and DOJ releases tied to the Jeffrey Epstein files contain photos of both men in social settings with Epstein or others, but those releases do not include images that validate the lurid online claims [6] [3] [2].
1. The authenticated images: social events, not sexual contact
The verifiable photographic record includes images of Trump and Clinton together at public events—such as a 2000 meeting at Trump Towers and other early-2000s social settings—which are archived by the Clinton Presidential Library and by news photo services, and by outlets that published batches from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate showing both men in social-company photographs, often redacted or captioned by committees and news organizations [1] [7] [2] [8]. Major news organizations reporting on the Epstein-related photo disclosures describe scenes of gatherings, poolside pictures with Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein, and group portraits; reporting repeatedly notes that none of the released photos plainly depict sexual misconduct [3] [9] [2].
2. Where the lurid claims originated and how they spread
The most sensational circulated images trace to two different phenomena: an authentic, older photo showing Clinton and Trump laughing and in close proximity at a public event that was repeatedly miscaptioned online, and AI-manipulated clips or doctored stills that amplified the insinuation of sexual contact [10] [4]. Fact‑checking organizations and the original photographer have identified viral clips that elongate or alter motion from real photos to fabricate groping behavior, and independent analysts have classified some viral media as AI-generated deepfakes [4] [10] [5].
3. What the Epstein-file releases actually show
When House Democrats and later DOJ releases included images from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, the batches contained photos of numerous high‑profile people socializing with Epstein and Maxwell—Donald Trump, Bill Clinton and others—but reporting from AP, CNN, ABC and Axios emphasizes these are social photographs, some undated and redacted, and do not by themselves demonstrate criminal conduct by those pictured [6] [3] [2] [9]. News coverage also highlights politically charged reactions to the releases, with both parties accusing the other of selective framing; outlets note redactions and context are frequently missing from the packets made public [3] [8].
4. Official and fact‑check responses: debunking specific sexualized images
Multiple fact‑checks found that the bed photo and the “Trump unbuckling Clinton’s pants” narrative are false or miscaptioned: Snopes concluded a circulated bed image and claims of groping were either misattributed or fabricated, and Poynter reported a viral clip showing explicit contact was AI‑generated with corroboration from the original photographer and analysts [5] [4] [10]. These investigations stress that while the men were photographed together historically, the leaps to sexual scenarios rely on manipulated media or false captions rather than authenticated original files [10] [4].
5. Limits of the publicly available record and the responsible takeaway
Public document dumps and archive images can show association but do not equate to proof of illicit acts; available reporting documents what is in the released archives and what reputable fact‑checkers have verified, but the sources do not show any authenticated photograph of Clinton and Trump in a sexual situation as described online [3] [2] [10]. Reporting also acknowledges lingering questions about how photo troves are redacted, released and framed for political effect, so readers should treat suggestive social media claims skeptically and rely on primary repositories and fact‑checking outlets when assessing extraordinary visual claims [6] [3] [8].