What evidence exists documenting flights Bill Clinton took on Jeffrey Epstein's plane and who accompanied him?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Publicly available primary evidence for Bill Clinton’s travel on Jeffrey Epstein’s aircraft consists chiefly of flight logs and related documents unsealed in litigation and released by the Department of Justice; those logs record Clinton as a passenger on multiple flight legs—commonly reported as between 17 and 27 legs across trips in 2002–2003—and show other named passengers on the same trips such as Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker and Ghislaine Maxwell, while contemporaneous statements from Clinton’s office and later summaries frame those trips as foundation‑related and deny any visits to Epstein’s private island [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. What the flight records are and how many flights they show
The core documentary evidence is the private flight logs compiled by Epstein’s pilots and produced in various court cases and by the Department of Justice; those logs list passenger names, initials and flight legs and have been the basis for multiple counts in media reporting—some outlets and summaries count “flight legs” and report figures such as 26 or 27 legs, while other reporting emphasizes “at least 17 flights” tied to 2002–2003 trips—reflecting differing ways of tallying segments versus round trips [2] [6] [1].
2. Where the flights went and why that matters
The logs and contemporaneous reporting indicate Clinton flew on Epstein’s airplanes to a range of international destinations in 2002–2003—reported stops include China, Siberia, Morocco and Armenia among others—and many news accounts and Clinton’s own representatives say those trips were connected to Clinton Foundation work or paid speeches, which is how Clinton’s team has characterized the purpose of the travel [1] [7] [5].
3. Who accompanied Clinton on those flights according to the records
Flight manifests and released documents list other high‑profile passengers on the same flights: actor Kevin Spacey and comedian Chris Tucker are explicitly named in logs from a 2002 Africa trip, and the initials or name of Ghislaine Maxwell appear on many of the same legs; broader releases and media compilations also show names like Prince Andrew, Naomi Campbell and others traveling on Epstein aircraft at various times, underscoring that the planes carried mixed groups of political figures, entertainers and associates [6] [3] [8] [4].
4. Limits of the evidence and disputed claims (island visits, Secret Service presence)
The flight logs document where planes went and who was recorded aboard but do not prove why individual people traveled or what occurred during those trips; importantly, multiple fact‑checking pieces and reporting note that none of the flight logs released to date list Clinton as a passenger on a Virgin Islands–bound plane and there is no documented evidence in those logs that Clinton visited Epstein’s private island, a claim repeatedly pushed in political rhetoric [2] [4]. The logs also sometimes omit contextual details such as whether Secret Service accompanied a former president on particular legs, and reporting has identified instances where Secret Service details were not listed for certain segments—an absence of notation in a log is not definitive proof of absence of protection, and sources disagree on how to interpret those entries [6] [4].
5. Competing narratives and official responses
Clinton’s office has publicly acknowledged travel on Epstein’s planes in 2002–2003 while stressing the trips were foundation‑related and asserting lack of knowledge about Epstein’s crimes; other actors and critics have counted flight segments differently to suggest a larger degree of association, creating a persistent gap between numerical tallies in the logs and the political framing of what those tallies mean—media outlets and fact‑checkers such as FactCheck.org, BBC and major newspapers have repeatedly pointed out the difference between counting flight legs and counting trips and have warned against inferring criminal conduct from presence on flight manifests alone [2] [9] [5].