Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What do flight logs show about Bill Clinton's travels with Jeffrey Epstein in 2003?
Executive Summary
The flight logs and reporting assembled from multiple outlets show a contested but clear fact: Bill Clinton traveled on Jeffrey Epstein’s aircraft multiple times in 2002–2003, with published counts ranging from four Foundation-related trips to upward of 26–27 logged legs; the precise tally depends on how “trip” and “leg” are defined and on which compilation of logs is used (counts differ across sources) [1] [2] [3]. Clinton’s office and spokespersons have consistently maintained that his travel on Epstein’s planes was for Clinton Foundation work, that he was accompanied by staff and Secret Service, and that he never visited Epstein’s private island—claims that reporters and some memoir accounts have disputed or left open [1] [4] [5].
1. How many flights do the logs actually show — big gaps between 4, 17, 26 and 27
Published treatments of Epstein’s flight logs report divergent totals. One set of compilations and mainstream reporting counts 17 distinct logged legs in 2002–03 with Clinton’s name appearing on Epstein manifests [6] [7]. Other reporting, including Roll Call and summaries of released logs, reports 26 flights or more between 2001–2003, and some sources extrapolate 27 legs for 2002–03 specifically [2] [8] [3]. By contrast, Clinton’s representatives state he took four trips associated with Clinton Foundation business on Epstein’s plane in 2002–2003, a figure cited in accounts including Virginia Giuffre’s memoir and media reporting [1]. The discrepancy reflects different methods: counting every listed flight leg vs. counting distinct multi-stop itineraries, and whether staff, aides and repeated names on multiple successive legs are aggregated. That technical distinction is central to reconciling public claims.
2. Where the flights went — exotic stops and public-facing missions, or unclear itineraries?
Compilations of logged itineraries show Clinton’s name attached to international routes including stops in Asia, Europe, Africa, and destinations described as Siberia, Morocco, China and Armenia in various reports [7] [8]. Those accounts frame many of the voyages as foundation-related travel, often listing accompanying aides, foundation staff, and Secret Service on the manifested legs — a detail emphasized by Clinton’s office to argue the trips were official and secure [1]. Other reporting highlights flights to high-profile global stops and notes some legs where Clinton’s Secret Service detail reportedly was not visible on the manifest, a point that has fueled further scrutiny and follow-up reporting [8]. The manifest entries alone do not record passenger purpose or the on-the-ground activities at each stop, leaving an evidentiary gap between a name on a list and the nature of each visit.
3. Clinton’s responses and third-party accounts — consistent denials, mixed eyewitness claims
Clinton’s office has repeatedly stated he never visited Epstein’s private island and that all his travels on Epstein’s planes were tied to philanthropic work, accompanied by staff and Secret Service [4] [1]. Virginia Giuffre’s memoir references Clinton flying on Epstein’s plane four times in 2002–2003 and situates some trips within broader guest lists that included actors and other public figures, while not asserting she personally accompanied him on those legs [1]. Epstein himself, in a 2015 email exchange later reported in documents, denied Clinton had been to the island: “Clinton was NEVER EVER there, never,” a categorical denial that reporters have noted while also flagging Epstein’s bias and inconsistent statements [5]. These varying accounts show a pattern of official denial paired with memoir and log-based reporting that invites deeper scrutiny.
4. What the record doesn’t tell us — gaps, provenance and interpretive choices
Manifests and aggregated lists are informative but limited: they show names, dates and legs, not passenger intent, duration at destinations, or unrecorded movements. Compilers differ on what counts as a separate trip (a single leg vs. multi-leg itinerary), which explains divergent totals from 4 to 27 [6] [2]. Some sources point to instances where Secret Service presence is not apparent on a manifest, but official protection details can travel on different manifests or records, so absence on one manifest is not conclusive [8]. Published denials and disclaimers come from parties with clear interests—Clinton’s office seeks to dispel wrongdoing allegations, Epstein sought self-protection in legal documents—so each claim requires weighing motive alongside documentary footprints [4] [5].
5. The bottom line for readers — what is established and what remains unsettled
It is established that Clinton’s name appears repeatedly on Epstein flight manifests in 2002–2003 and that reporters and researchers have counted anywhere from a handful to more than two dozen logged legs [6] [2] [3]. It is also established that Clinton’s team maintains the trips were Foundation-related and that he did not visit Epstein’s island—claims supported by some documentary statements and denied by others tied to conflicting memories and agendas [1] [5]. What remains unsettled are the precise number of distinct trips depending on counting method, the detailed activities at each stop beyond foundation work, and the implications those travels should have for assessing Clinton’s knowledge of Epstein’s crimes; those questions require further primary-document disclosure and corroborated contemporaneous accounts to fully close the gaps [7] [8].