Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What specific statements did Bill Clinton make about his flights on Jeffrey Epstein's plane and meetings with him?

Checked on November 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Bill Clinton’s public account—first summarized in a 2019 spokesperson statement—says he took “a total of four trips” on Jeffrey Epstein’s planes in 2002–2003, traveled with Clinton Foundation staff and Secret Service on those humanitarian trips, met Epstein once in his New York apartment in 2002, and “knows nothing about the terrible crimes” Epstein committed [1] [2]. Independent reporting and released flight logs, however, show many more individual flight segments tied to Clinton—reports have cited between 17 and 26 flights or 26 flight segments during 2002–2003—while also finding no flight-log evidence that Clinton went to Epstein’s private island [3] [4] [5] [6].

1. What Clinton himself (and his office) said: limited trips, humanitarian purpose, no knowledge of crimes

Clinton’s team issued a public statement saying he took multiple flights on Epstein’s planes during 2002–2003 but framed them as four trips connected to Clinton Foundation work, that he met Epstein in New York in 2002, and that he “knows nothing about the terrible crimes” to which Epstein later pleaded guilty; the statement also asserted Clinton never visited Epstein’s island, New Mexico ranch, or Palm Beach residence [1] [2] [3].

2. What flight logs and reporters reported: far more flight segments recorded

Journalistic reconstructions of Epstein’s flight manifests and court-unsealed logs have counted many more appearances of Clinton’s name than the “four trips” phrasing implies. Major outlets and court filings have reported Clinton on Epstein’s aircraft for dozens of flight segments across several trips—variously summarized as 17 occasions, 26 flights, or 26 flight segments between Feb. 2002 and Nov. 2003—because Clinton’s “four trips” phrasing counted extended journeys while logs list individual legs [5] [4] [6] [7].

3. The key disputed point: island visits and counting methods

Multiple outlets and fact-checking work emphasize that although flight logs show Clinton on many Epstein flights, they do not show Clinton traveling to Epstein’s Little St. James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; FactCheck.org and other reporting state there is “no evidence” Clinton visited that island, and logs relevant to Virgin Islands flights do not list him as a passenger [4] [2] [8]. Part of the dispute stems from counting: critics who cite higher numbers often count each flight segment (takeoff/landing leg), while Clinton’s statement grouped segments into four round-trip or multi-stop “trips” [1] [4].

4. Context: who else was on those trips and why they happened

Reporting repeatedly places Clinton’s Epstein flights in the context of foundation-related travel: Clinton reportedly traveled with staff, supporters and Secret Service on international “humanitarian” trips—an Africa tour in 2002 is frequently cited—where Epstein provided his plane [2] [3] [5]. Clinton later praised philanthropic work at the time but has said he “cut ties” with Epstein once allegations emerged [2].

5. Political amplification and competing narratives

Political figures have seized on the difference between “four trips” and the larger number of flight segments. For example, then-President Donald Trump publicly disputed Clinton’s account, citing larger counts; defenders of Clinton and fact-checkers point out the methodological difference and the absence of island-bound log entries for Clinton [1] [4] [9]. Republican congressional inquiries have used flight logs and other records as a basis for subpoenas and depositions of the Clintons, reflecting partisan oversight dynamics [6].

6. Limits of current public record and remaining questions

Available sources repeatedly note limitations: public flight manifests and court documents show Clinton’s name on many Epstein flights but do not themselves establish criminal conduct by Clinton, and sources stress that no flight log (as reported) lists Clinton on a plane to Epstein’s private island [4] [2]. The House Oversight Committee releases and unsealed documents prompted further scrutiny, but the sources provided do not contain an authoritative, reconciled ledger produced by Clinton’s office matching every logged segment to the “four trips” phrasing [6] [3].

7. Bottom line for readers: what Clinton definitely said, and what reporting adds

Definitively, Clinton’s camp said: four trips in 2002–2003, accompanied by staff and Secret Service, one meeting in Epstein’s New York apartment in 2002, and no knowledge of Epstein’s crimes [1] [2]. Independent reporting and unsealed logs add that Clinton’s name appears on many more flight segments—estimates range from about 17 to 26 appearances depending on counting—and that there is no logged evidence placing him on flights to Epstein’s private island [5] [4] [8]. Available sources do not mention a comprehensive, reconciled minute-by-minute public accounting from Clinton mapping each logged flight segment to the “four trips” language (not found in current reporting).

Want to dive deeper?
What evidence corroborates Bill Clinton's claimed reasons for flying on Jeffrey Epstein's plane?
Did flight logs or manifest records match Clinton's stated passenger lists and trip purposes?
Have Clinton aides or staff publicly confirmed his accounts of meetings with Epstein?
What discrepancies exist between Clinton's statements and witness or flight data about Epstein connections?
How have reporters and investigators assessed Clinton's explanations about his interactions with Epstein?