Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Have independent audits or investigative reports found misuse or mismanagement of Black Lives Matter funds?
Executive Summary
Independent audits and investigations have produced mixed findings: there are documented instances of fraud by individual operatives and multiple probes into the Black Lives Matter ecosystem, but no definitive public audit has universally concluded that the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation (BLMGNF) broadly misappropriated the $90 million raised in 2020. Federal and civil inquiries, state enforcement actions, internal transparency efforts, and at least one criminal conviction show both accountability gaps and isolated criminality; the largest, ongoing Department of Justice review reported in late October 2025 focuses on potential misuse by leaders but has not publicly produced final charges or an audit report [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. High-stakes federal scrutiny lands headlines — What investigators say and what remains unproven
A Department of Justice probe into donations tied to the 2020 protests has been publicly reported as active and centered on the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, with subpoenas and at least one search warrant executed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles. The DOJ’s involvement escalates the matter beyond journalism and civil suits into potential criminal inquiry, but reporting notes the foundation denies being a target of a federal criminal investigation and no criminal indictments tied to the foundation’s national leadership have been publicly filed as of the latest reports [1] [2] [3]. The existence of a probe signals serious questions about recordkeeping and self-dealing allegations, yet an investigation is not a finding of guilt; the public record lacks a concluded federal audit or prosecutorial determination that the network-wide funds were misused.
2. Independent audits, 990s, and transparency claims — Organization responses and audits cited
The Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation has published fiscal filings, impact reports, and claims of independent external audits for FY2020–FY2021, and a transparency center emphasizes commitments to stronger compliance and public access to 990 forms. BLMGNF disputes assertions of widespread mismanagement and points to published documents and audit summaries as evidence of transparency efforts [5] [6]. Those materials show grants distributed and assets reported, but independent news investigations and some watchdog critics highlight gaps between public accounting and donor expectations, such as the relative share of donations going to external grants versus internal expenditures. The public filings provide context but do not fully settle disputes about alleged self-dealing or operational oversight; detailed independent forensic audits referenced in outside reporting are not uniformly available in the public domain.
3. Lawsuits and state actions paint a fragmented accountability picture
Civil litigation and state regulatory actions have produced contested allegations and some enforcement steps, but legal outcomes have varied. A 2022 lawsuit by Black Lives Matter Grassroots accused a BLMGNF board member of diverting more than $10 million; the suit was dismissed in June 2023, and the foundation denied those claims [7]. State charity regulators have at times pressed for registration compliance and halted fundraising in certain jurisdictions, reflecting concerns about governance and reporting. These fragmented legal and administrative outcomes reveal accountability mechanisms activating in multiple venues, but dismissals and denials underscore that allegations have not uniformly translated into proven systemic theft or universal findings of mismanagement across the movement.
4. Proven criminal conduct was limited to specific actors, not the entire network
There are documented criminal convictions involving individuals operating under BLM-related names: a notable conviction and 42-month sentence for Sir Maejor Page, who stole more than $450,000 from donors while operating a local BLM affiliate, demonstrates that fraud occurred in the movement’s orbit [4]. This conviction establishes that misuse of BLM-labeled donations has occurred in concrete, prosecutable instances, but prosecutors and reporting distinguish local fraudulent operators from the national network’s audited finances. The presence of individual criminality supports calls for better oversight and donor safeguards without, by itself, proving the national entity systematically laundered or misused funds.
5. Big-picture assessment — What the evidence supports and key unknowns going forward
Taken together, the record supports three clear facts: federal authorities are investigating major donation flows from 2020, independent outlets and critics have raised substantive questions about governance and spending (including property purchases), and there are proven cases of local fraud. What remains unresolved in the public record is whether audits or investigations will substantiate systemic mismanagement or criminality at the national foundation level, because the most consequential probe—the DOJ review reported in October 2025—has not produced a public final report or charges tied specifically to national-level embezzlement. Continued disclosure of audit findings, public release of forensic reviews, and legal rulings will be decisive; until then, the evidence documents serious concerns and isolated crimes but stops short of a conclusive, network-wide finding of misuse [1] [8] [7] [3] [4].