Has either chamber of Congress advanced or voted on the Born in America Act in 2025?

1. How the Born in the USA Act entered the 2025 record

Members of the House introduced the Born in the USA Act in 2025 to block what they called unlawful executive action and to protect traditional birthright principles; Representative Delia Ramirez and a coalition including chairs of several caucuses publicly announced the bill and framed it as a prohibition on federal agencies enforcing President Trump’s executive order ^{[2] [1]}. The Library of Congress records show a House text identified as H.R.3368 titled “Born in the USA Act of 2025,” confirming formal introduction into the congressional docket ^[1].

2. Committee referral and companion measures in play

Congressional tracking pages list related measures on the same subject — for example, a Senate entry for S.646 named “Born in the USA Act” and separate bills under the broader category of birthright citizenship such as the Birthright Citizenship Act (H.R.569 / S.304) — indicating multiple parallel efforts and formal committee actions surrounding birthright citizenship in 2025 ^{[5] [6]}. These entries demonstrate that the issue drew substantial legislative attention and competing proposals in both chambers, but listing on Congress.gov does not by itself mean floor action occurred ^{[5] [6]}.

3. What advanced and what stalled: voting history in 2025

Public reporting and fact‑checks conclude the Born in the USA Act did not advance to a recorded floor vote in 2025; fact‑check outlets that examined viral claims of passage found no congressional activity to substantiate assertions that the bill passed or that federal officeholders were forced to resign as a result ^{[3] [4]}. The misinformation narratives amplified in late‑2025 — including specific vote tallies and dramatic enforcement scenes — are contradicted by the absence of credible news coverage or official congressional records showing a completed floor vote on the bill ^{[4] [3]}.

4. The political context shaping reporting and confusion

The bill’s introduction must be seen against the backdrop of President Trump’s January 20, 2025 executive order “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” which sought to reinterpret the Fourteenth Amendment and prompted legislative responses from both parties ^[7]. Opponents of the administration’s order pushed measures like the Born in the USA Act to block federal agencies from implementing the order, while separate Republican proposals sought to curtail birthright citizenship by statute, further complicating public understanding of which measures were active, which were symbolic, and which reached a vote ^{[7] [6] [8]}.

5. Why the record matters: transparency and the limits of social claims

The discrepancy between loud social‑media claims of passage and the congressional record underscores the need to check primary sources: Congress.gov entries confirm introductions (H.R.3368; S.646), press releases document sponsorship and intent (Rep. Ramirez), and independent fact‑checks verified that no floor vote occurred in 2025 ^{[1] [5] [2] [3]}. Reporting that collapses distinct bills or conflates introduction with enactment or passage misleads the public; the verified record for 2025 shows introduction and committee activity for various bills but no completed congressional vote on the Born in the USA Act that year ^{[1] [5] [3]}.

6. Bottom line

Congressional records and multiple fact‑checks agree: the Born in the USA Act was introduced and publicly promoted in 2025 but was not advanced to, nor voted on, by either chamber during that year ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Claims that it passed the Senate or produced mass resignations lack supporting congressional documentation and have been debunked ^{[4] [3]}.