What is the current status of Burkina Faso-Israel relations in 2024?
Executive summary
Burkina Faso and Israel maintained formal diplomatic relations in 2024, with reciprocal embassy representations reported in Ouagadougou and Jerusalem, evidence of an ongoing bilateral relationship rather than a rupture [1] [2]. Across Africa in 2024, governments largely avoided sweeping diplomatic breakages with Israel even amid the Gaza war, and Israel’s limited but persistent diplomatic presence on the continent framed its ties with countries like Burkina Faso as resilient but modest [3].
1. Diplomatic footprint: embassies, envoys and continuity
The basic architecture of official ties in 2024 remained intact: commercial embassy directories list an Israeli embassy in Ouagadougou and a Burkinabè embassy in Jerusalem, signaling formal, resident or at least accredited diplomatic channels between the two states [1] [2]. Historical records show Burkina Faso and Israel have had on-and-off diplomatic ties since the 1960s and were among countries that (re)established relations in the post-1973 era and into the 1990s, underscoring that the 2024 relationship sat inside a long, if intermittent, bilateral arc [4].
2. Political context: regional turbulence and African responses to the Gaza war
Burkina Faso’s domestic politics in the mid-2020s—marked by military rule after a 2022 coup and intensified internal conflict—shaped the backdrop for its foreign policy choices, and international organizations have urged states to apply pressure on Israel over Gaza while simultaneously documenting severe abuses inside Burkina Faso, complicating diplomatic postures [5]. Yet analysts covering Africa’s collective response note that, unlike past Middle East wars when many African states severed ties with Israel, most governments in 2024 avoided drastic diplomatic ruptures, a regional pattern that benefited continuity in bilateral relationships including with smaller Sahel states [3].
3. Strategic content: limited Israeli outreach and pragmatic cooperation
Israel’s engagement in Africa in 2024 was pragmatic and resource-constrained: the Atlantic Council highlighted that Israel had far fewer missions in Africa than during its 1960s heyday—only a modest set of embassies, economic representations and military attachés continent-wide—suggesting that relations with countries such as Burkina Faso were functional but not central to an aggressive Israeli Africa strategy [3]. Scholarly and policy work also situates Israel’s African diplomacy around security and development cooperation—areas relevant to Sahel states confronting insurgency—although specific public reporting on major new Israel–Burkina Faso security deals in 2024 is not present in the sources provided [6] [3].
4. Public pressure, reputational risk and the limits of available reporting
While civil-society and international actors called for measures against Israel over Gaza, and while Burkina Faso faced its own human-rights scrutiny at home, the available reporting does not document a Burkina Faso decision in 2024 to sever ties or impose broad sanctions on Israel; instead the picture is one of cautious continuity amid reputational pressures [5] [3]. The sources also do not provide detailed polling or official Burkinabè statements on public sentiment toward Israel in 2024, so conclusions about domestic political drivers must be cautious and treated as gaps in the public record [5] [3].
5. Bottom line and near-term outlook
In 2024 the bilateral relationship between Burkina Faso and Israel was intact and modest: formal embassies existed, diplomatic channels remained open, and broader African patterns of avoiding wholesale diplomatic breakages supported continuity, even as Israel’s overall footprint in Africa was smaller than in past decades [1] [2] [3]. The relationship’s future hinges on competing pressures—security cooperation imperatives in the Sahel, domestic political volatility in Burkina Faso, and shifting regional reactions to Israel’s actions—areas where the available sources either highlight potential strategic openings or document pressures but do not prove any imminent change to ties in 2024 [6] [5] [3].