Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Which organizations have been accused of funding protests in California?
1. Summary of the results
Several organizations have been accused of funding protests in California, though the evidence varies significantly:
- The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) received substantial government funding - $34 million in 2023, up from $12.4 million in 2022 [1] [2]
- The Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) has been accused of having ties to socialist funding sources and the Chinese Communist Party [3]
- President Trump accused Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass of paying violent protesters, though no evidence was provided to support this claim [4]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several important contextual elements need to be considered:
- CHIRLA's funding was legitimate government money, including:
California Department of Social Services
California Arts Council
Governor's Office of Emergency Services [1]
CHIRLA explicitly denies involvement in violent protests [3]
- The $3 million from the Department of Social Services was specifically earmarked for legal services to immigrants, not protests [2]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
There are several instances of misinformation surrounding protest funding:
- Widespread conspiracy theories about George Soros orchestrating and funding protests have been thoroughly debunked [5]
- Claims about "Soros-funded organizations" placing bricks for protesters were proven false and traced to a Malaysian building supply company [6]
- The question itself might suggest improper funding of protests, when in fact many organizations receive legitimate government funding for legal and social services [1] [2]
Those who benefit from pushing various narratives include:
- Political figures like Trump, who can use accusations against Democratic leaders (Newsom, Bass) to energize their base [4]
- Anti-immigration groups who can use CHIRLA's government funding to criticize immigrant support programs [1]
- Conspiracy theorists who can use these narratives to promote broader anti-establishment messages [5]