Has Candace Owens provided evidence for her claims about Charlie Kirk's death?

Checked on September 22, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Was this fact-check helpful?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided suggest that Candace Owens has been spreading conspiracy theories and rumors about Charlie Kirk's death, including claims that billionaire Bill Ackman threatened Kirk [1] and that Kirk may have been targeted because of his views on the war in Gaza [1]. However, none of the sources provide evidence that Owens has presented concrete evidence for her claims [2] [3]. In fact, some sources report that Ackman and others have denied Owens' accusations, indicating a lack of credible evidence to support her claims [1]. Key findings include the absence of evidence supporting Owens' claims and the presence of denials from individuals implicated in her conspiracy theories.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources do not mention Candace Owens or her claims about Charlie Kirk's death, and therefore neither support nor contradict the claim [4] [5] [6]. Alternative viewpoints may include the perspectives of individuals or groups who have been affected by Owens' conspiracy theories, such as the family and friends of Charlie Kirk, or experts who have studied the spread of misinformation online [2]. Additionally, context about the feud between Owens and other MAGA figures may be relevant to understanding her motivations for spreading conspiracy theories about Kirk's death [2]. The role of social media in amplifying Owens' claims and other conspiracy theories about Kirk's death is also an important context to consider [4].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement implies that Candace Owens may have provided evidence for her claims about Charlie Kirk's death, but the analyses suggest that this is not the case [2] [3]. Potential bias in the original statement may include a tendency to assume that Owens has presented credible evidence for her claims, when in fact the opposite appears to be true [1]. Those who benefit from this framing may include Owens herself, who may be using conspiracy theories to advance her own agenda or gain attention [2], as well as individuals or groups who seek to exploit the controversy surrounding Kirk's death for their own purposes [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the official reports on Charlie Kirk's death?
Has Candace Owens faced criticism for spreading misinformation about Charlie Kirk's death?
What is the relationship between Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk in the context of conservative media?