How has Candace Owens responded to criticism of her conspiracy theories?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
Candace Owens has responded to criticism of her conspiracy theories in various ways, including railing against individuals who thought they could fill any leadership void created by Charlie Kirk's assassination [1], and spreading conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk's death, including rumors that Kirk may have been targeted because of his views on the war in Gaza [2]. Owens has also been rebuked by Kirk's pastor for her behavior [2]. Additionally, Megyn Kelly backed up Candace Owens' commentary about Charlie Kirk's views on Israel, characterizing Owens as 'brilliant' [3]. Owens has also taken credit for FBI Director Kash Patel's statement addressing conspiracies about Charlie Kirk's assassination [4], and has celebrated the statement, which some analysts see as a dog whistle towards Neo-Nazis and Jew haters [4]. Furthermore, Owens has been spreading conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk's death, including claims that he was targeted because of his views on the war in Gaza, and that billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman threatened Kirk during an 'intervention' about his views [5]. However, Andrew Kolvet, the executive producer of The Charlie Kirk Show, has debunked Candace Owens' anti-Israel conspiracy theory about Charlie Kirk's death [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Some key context that is missing from the original statement includes the fact that Candace Owens has a history of promoting conspiracy theories [7], and that experts say that Owens' claims are part of a wider trend of conspiracy theories targeting prominent women in politics and culture [7]. Additionally, Owens has been sued for defamation as a result of her conspiracy theories [7]. Alternative viewpoints on the issue include Andrew Kolvet's debunking of Owens' anti-Israel conspiracy theory [6], and Megyn Kelly's support for Owens' commentary on Charlie Kirk's views on Israel [3]. Some of the key points that are missing from the original statement include:
- The fact that Candace Owens has been spreading conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk's death, including claims that he was targeted because of his views on the war in Gaza [5]
- The fact that Andrew Kolvet, the executive producer of The Charlie Kirk Show, has debunked Candace Owens' anti-Israel conspiracy theory about Charlie Kirk's death [6]
- The fact that Candace Owens has a history of promoting conspiracy theories, including the false claim that Brigitte Macron is a man [7]
- The fact that experts say that Owens' claims are part of a wider trend of conspiracy theories targeting prominent women in politics and culture [7]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading or biased because it does not provide a complete picture of Candace Owens' response to criticism of her conspiracy theories. For example, Owens has been rebuked by Kirk's pastor for her behavior [2], and has been spreading conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk's death, including claims that he was targeted because of his views on the war in Gaza [5]. Additionally, Owens has a history of promoting conspiracy theories [7], which may indicate a pattern of behavior. The original statement may also be biased towards Candace Owens because it does not provide adequate context about her history of promoting conspiracy theories, and does not adequately represent the diverse range of viewpoints on the issue, including Andrew Kolvet's debunking of Owens' anti-Israel conspiracy theory [6], and Megyn Kelly's support for Owens' commentary on Charlie Kirk's views on Israel [3]. The beneficiaries of this framing may include Candace Owens herself, as well as her supporters and allies, who may use the original statement to promote her conspiracy theories and discredit her critics. On the other hand, the victims of this framing may include Charlie Kirk's family and supporters, who may be hurt or offended by Owens' conspiracy theories, as well as the wider public, who may be misinformed or misled by Owens' claims [2] [5] [7].