What were Candace Owens' exact comments about the Holocaust?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, Candace Owens made several controversial statements about the Holocaust and World War II that have been widely characterized as Holocaust denial and distortion. The most specific documented comments include her denial of Nazi medical experimentation on Jews in concentration camps during World War II [1]. In one particularly controversial statement, Owens referred to the torturous experiments on Jewish prisoners during the Holocaust as "bizarre propaganda" [2].
The timeline indicates that Owens engaged in Holocaust distortion and denial in a July 2024 podcast episode [3], which became a focal point of criticism. Her comments went beyond just questioning historical facts - she downplayed the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany more broadly [4] and questioned the taboo surrounding discussions of Hitler and Nazi Germany [4].
The international consequences of her statements were severe. Both New Zealand and Australia refused her visa applications specifically due to her Holocaust denial comments and promotion of conspiracy theories and antisemitism [1]. This represents concrete governmental action taken in response to her statements.
The public response was swift and widespread. Her comments drew condemnation from public figures and organizations [4], with the Combat Antisemitism Movement labeling her statements as "utterly repugnant" [2]. Social media users and various organizations criticized her remarks [2], indicating the controversy extended beyond official channels.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The analyses reveal that Owens' Holocaust-related comments are part of a broader pattern of antisemitic rhetoric. According to the sources, she has a history of making antisemitic remarks, including promoting conspiracy theories about Jewish influence and making derogatory comments about the Jewish community [3]. This context suggests her Holocaust comments weren't isolated incidents but part of a consistent ideological position.
An important educational dimension emerges from the analyses: Owens allegedly suggested that education about this period amounts to "indoctrination" akin to "Soviet tactics" [4]. This framing positions Holocaust education itself as problematic, which represents a significant escalation beyond questioning specific historical details.
The sources indicate that her comments specifically targeted Nazi medical experimentation, particularly referencing what appears to be the infamous experiments conducted by figures like Josef Mengele [2]. However, the analyses don't provide her complete rationale or the full context of her arguments, which limits understanding of her complete position.
What's notably absent is any indication of Owens' response to the criticism or whether she has clarified, defended, or retracted any of her statements. The analyses also don't reveal whether she has provided any historical sources or evidence to support her claims, or if she has engaged with Holocaust historians or survivors.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question asking for Owens' "exact comments" is problematic because the analyses don't provide verbatim quotes for most of her statements. Only one specific phrase is directly quoted: her reference to Holocaust experiments as "bizarre propaganda" [2]. The other characterizations appear to be summaries or paraphrases rather than exact quotations.
The question itself may inadvertently amplify harmful content by seeking to reproduce Holocaust denial statements in detail. This approach could potentially spread misinformation even when intended for fact-checking purposes.
There's also a temporal issue: while the analyses reference her July 2024 podcast episode as a key moment, they don't clearly distinguish between comments made at different times, potentially conflating various statements made across different platforms and dates.
The framing assumes these are isolated "comments" rather than part of a documented pattern. The analyses show that Owens has made multiple antisemitic remarks over time [3], suggesting this isn't about singular controversial statements but rather a consistent ideological position that includes Holocaust denial and broader antisemitic conspiracy theories.
Finally, the question doesn't acknowledge the serious real-world consequences of such statements, including their role in visa denials from multiple countries and their contribution to the broader landscape of Holocaust denial and antisemitism.