Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What led to Candace Owens leaving Turning Point USA in 2019?

Checked on November 24, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Candace Owens resigned as Turning Point USA’s communications director in May 2019 amid backlash over controversial remarks she had made — most notably comments about Adolf Hitler first publicized in late 2018 — and formal calls for her removal from multiple TPUSA campus chapters; Owens framed her departure as a decision to focus on her BLEXIT work, podcasting and a forthcoming book [1] [2] [3] [4]. Reporting and reference sites identify both the controversy over those remarks and the internal pressure from chapters as the proximate causes of her leaving, while Owens and allied outlets emphasized career and project priorities [3] [4] [5].

1. How the controversy started: headline-making remarks about Hitler

Public attention pivoted in early 2019 after past comments by Owens about Adolf Hitler were publicized; multiple encyclopedic and news summaries say those comments sparked the controversy that precipitated her exit from Turning Point USA [2] [1]. Coverage by Britannica and other outlets explicitly links the Hitler remarks to the resignation, saying she left after the controversy over those comments became widely known [2].

2. Campus chapters demanded accountability — internal pressure mounted

Turning Point USA’s own student chapters at University of Colorado Boulder, University of Nebraska Omaha, Bowling Green State University and others publicly criticized Owens and signed statements urging she step down, arguing her rhetoric was divisive and damaged TPUSA’s reputation on campuses [3] [6] [1]. Atlanta Black Star and local reporting describe chapter leaders saying they could not align with Owens’ rhetoric and therefore sought her removal [3].

3. Owens’ explanation: pursue BLEXIT, podcasting and other projects

In announcing her departure Owens framed it as a personal career move: she told followers she wanted to focus on the BLEXIT movement, her podcast work (with PragerU at the time) and an upcoming book, and said she no longer felt she could dedicate herself fully to the communications director role as TPUSA grew [4] [7]. Several outlets reiterate her Instagram statement that projects outside TPUSA motivated the resignation [7] [4].

4. Two narratives: forced out vs. voluntary exit

Contemporaneous reporting presents two competing narratives. One, advanced by chapters and critics, frames the resignation as the outcome of concerted pressure after her controversial remarks were publicized [3] [6]. The other, voiced by Owens and sympathetic outlets, treats the exit as voluntary and part of a strategic pivot to build BLEXIT and media projects [4] [7]. Reference sources like TPUSA’s timeline and encyclopedic entries note the resignation date and the controversy without uniformly ascribing sole responsibility to either account [1] [5].

5. How major reference outlets summarize the episode

Encyclopedic sources — Wikipedia and Britannica — and organizational histories consistently place the resignation in May 2019 and tie it to the late‑2018/early‑2019 publicity around Owens’ remarks and the subsequent chapter demands for resignation [5] [1] [2] [8]. These sources also note Owens’ other activities (PragerU, BLEXIT) as part of the broader context in which she left TPUSA [5] [4].

6. Limitations, gaps and what the sources do not say

Available sources do not mention internal TPUSA board minutes, direct private communications between Owens and TPUSA leadership, or any formal internal disciplinary process; reporting relies on public statements by chapters and Owens’ own Instagram post [3] [4]. There is no single document in the provided reporting proving an explicit firing order from TPUSA leadership; instead, the public record shows overlapping pressure from student chapters and Owens’ stated career reasons [3] [4] [1].

7. Why this mattered then — and how it’s been referenced since

The episode mattered because it exposed tensions inside a major conservative youth group about public-facing rhetoric and brand control: student chapters publicly distancing themselves signaled reputational risk for TPUSA [3] [6]. Subsequent summaries of Owens’ career repeatedly cite the resignation as a turning point that preceded her growth as an independent media figure and the expansion of BLEXIT and PragerU/Daily Wire platforms [5] [4].

Bottom line: contemporaneous coverage attributes Owens’ May 2019 departure to a mix of public controversy over her past remarks (notably about Hitler), organized calls for resignation from TPUSA chapters, and Owens’ own stated desire to pursue BLEXIT, podcasting and a book — with different outlets emphasizing either the external pressure or Owens’ voluntary career reasons [2] [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What specific events or conflicts precipitated Candace Owens' departure from Turning Point USA in 2019?
How did Candace Owens' public statements and social media behavior influence her split with Turning Point USA?
What role did internal leadership disputes at Turning Point USA play in Candace Owens' exit?
How did Turning Point USA officially explain Owens' departure and how did her account differ?
What impact did Owens leaving Turning Point USA have on her career and the organization's trajectory afterward?