Is Candace Owens still associated with TPUSA Blexit Foundation partnership?

1. The institutional claim: BLEXIT has been tied to TPUSA

Multiple sources describe BLEXIT as closely associated with Turning Point USA: news reporting and organizational profiles say BLEXIT was “run by” or tied to the TPUSA network and that its branding and corporate structure were to be incorporated with TPUSA while keeping Owens and Brandon Tatum as leaders ^{[1] [2]}. Those portrayals frame BLEXIT not as an entirely independent ad hoc project but as an entity operating within or alongside TPUSA structures ^[2].

2. The public dispute: TPUSA and Owens openly at odds

By late 2025 the relationship had degenerated into public conflict. TPUSA invited Owens to participate in a livestream to address her allegations about the organization and its late founder; Owens later pushed back on logistics and the two sides traded accusations about who declined or backed out, indicating a breakdown in cooperation ^{[4] [5] [6]}. Commentary from TPUSA staff explicitly criticized Owens’ claims and said they had suffered harassment tied to her statements ^[7].

3. Platform moves and signals of separation

An archived social post reports that TPUSA removed Owens’ BLEXIT page and ended company-wide communications tied to her — a concrete operational signal that TPUSA is curtailing institutional ties or at least access previously granted ^[3]. That action, while not a legal contract termination in the reporting presented, is a clear administrative step consistent with de‑facto separation on TPUSA’s platforms ^[3].

4. Competing narratives: Owens’ supporters vs. TPUSA spokespeople

Sources show competing narratives. Barrett Media and Owens-aligned commentators say Owens offered to appear virtually and that TPUSA refused the virtual option, portraying TPUSA as performing a PR stunt ^[4]. TPUSA-associated voices — including producers of Charlie Kirk’s show — say Owens made reckless allegations and declined opportunities to clear them up in person, portraying Owens as avoiding accountability ^[7]. Both sides present a factual sequence of invitations and refusals, but they disagree sharply on motive and who acted first ^{[4] [7]}.

5. Public context: BLEXIT’s activity and reception on campuses

Separately, BLEXIT continued to operate on the ground: reporting on a campus tour described BLEXIT “run by the late Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA” and noted pushback at historically Black colleges, showing the group remained an active, organized presence tied in public discourse to TPUSA even amid controversy ^[1]. That operational footprint complicates any simple “split” narrative because local activity and branding continued to evoke TPUSA links ^[1].

6. What sources do not say — limits of current reporting

Available sources do not cite corporate filings, tax documents, or a definitive public statement that ends or legally severs a formal TPUSA–BLEXIT partnership; they instead document organizational descriptions, platform removals, invitations and counterclaims ^{[3] [4] [2]}. They do not provide an authoritative, final legal determination of status; therefore one cannot assert a definitive legal separation on the basis of the reporting presented ^{[3] [2]}.

7. Bottom line: de facto distancing, contested association remains

Factually: reporting documents both historical and operational ties between BLEXIT and TPUSA ^{[1] [2]} and, more recently, administrative/PR moves and public confrontations indicating TPUSA is distancing itself from Owens’ public platforming ^{[3] [4] [7]}. Interpretations differ by source: Owens’ allies portray her as willing to engage virtually ^[4]; TPUSA voices portray her as making false and harmful claims and declining in‑person accountability ^[7]. For a legal or formal answer, current reporting is inconclusive; verification would require internal documents or formal statements not present in these sources ^{[3] [2]}.