What evidence did Candace Owens present about Tyler Robinson's university attendance?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
Candace Owens asserted that Tyler Robinson had never attended Utah Valley University in relation to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, but the documents supplied for this review contain no direct evidence presented by Owens to substantiate that specific claim [1] [2]. Independent reporting included in the analyses instead identifies Robinson as having studied briefly at Utah State University and currently enrolled in an electrical apprenticeship program at Dixie Technical College in St. George, Utah; none of the sources show verified attendance at Utah Valley University [3] [4]. Several items note surveillance and background details about Robinson tied to the wider investigation, but not Owens’ evidentiary proof [5] [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The provided analyses emphasize that coverage of Robinson’s education contains gaps: sources record his brief time at Utah State and his enrollment at Dixie Technical College, plus outstanding questions about his political donations and registration status, which is described as registered but unaffiliated [3] [5]. Absent from the material are primary documents—enrollment records, statements from Utah Valley University, or direct citations Owens may have used—so alternative explanations (misidentification of institutions, conflation of attendance versus enrollment, or reliance on secondary reports) cannot be ruled out [7] [8]. These omissions limit the ability to confirm or refute Owens’ claim from the supplied sources alone [2].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
Framing the situation as though Owens produced definitive proof that Robinson never attended Utah Valley University benefits narratives that seek to undermine institutional or investigatory claims without documentary corroboration; the supplied analyses show no such proof and instead point to conflicting or incomplete education records [1] [3] [4]. Different outlets emphasize disparate elements—some highlight Robinson’s academic achievements and surprising alleged actions, others focus on surveillance footage and parental social media—revealing competing agendas to either humanize, sensationalize, or politicize the suspect [5] [9]. Given the lack of primary enrollment evidence in these sources, claims presented as settled fact risk spreading misinformation and may advantage actors aiming to shift public attention away from verified investigative findings [2] [8].