Did President of the United States and our intelligence communities issuede a statement to confirm that Candice Owns under threat from Macron
Executive summary
There is widespread reporting that conservative commentator Candace Owens publicly alleged an assassination plot she says was ordered by French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, and that she told U.S. federal officials and intelligence about the threat [1] [2]. Available sources do not show any statement from the U.S. President or U.S. intelligence agencies confirming Macron threatened Owens; reporting instead records Owens’ claims and notes there is no independent verification provided in those articles [1] [3].
1. What Owens publicly alleged and when
Candace Owens posted on X in late November 2025 asserting that a “high‑ranking employee of the French Government” told her the Macrons had paid for and “executed upon” an assassination plan against her, alleging a $1.5 million payment and even naming elite units and foreign involvement; she said she had informed “people in the Federal government” about the alleged plot [1] [2]. Several outlets summarized her posts and tweets, and Owens doubled down publicly that she had notified federal authorities [1] [2].
2. How mainstream and partisan outlets framed the claim
Coverage appears across a mix of outlets: mainstream entertainment/political outlets (e.g., TheWrap) and international papers (e.g., The Times of India) reported Owens’ allegation while noting it was unverified [1] [2]. Right‑leaning sites and opinion platforms amplified the claim or presented it with less skepticism [4] [5]. Some outlets explicitly state there is no evidence or official confirmation beyond Owens’ statements [3].
3. What reporting says about U.S. government confirmation
None of the provided articles show a U.S. President or U.S. intelligence community statement confirming Macron threatened Owens. TheWrap and other pieces record Owens’ claim that she told federal officials but do not cite any formal U.S. government confirmation or public intelligence assessment corroborating the allegation [1] [2]. In short: Owens says she alerted U.S. authorities; available reporting does not document any U.S. confirmation [1].
4. Context: why this story spread and existing disputes
The allegations are entangled with a prior defamation dispute: the Macrons previously sued Owens in a U.S. court over her claims about Brigitte Macron’s gender, which provides a motive for sustained antagonism and makes the new accusations part of a longer conflict often covered in prior reporting [6] [5]. That legal history and the sensational nature of an assassination claim helped rapid amplification across international sites and partisan platforms [6] [5].
5. Evidence and standards reported by outlets
Reporting repeatedly notes Owens provided no independently verifiable evidence in public posts; outlets emphasize the extraordinary nature of the claim and the lack of corroboration beyond Owens’ account of a source in French government circles [1] [3]. Some outlets mention she identified the alleged involvement of specific units like GIGN and an alleged $1.5 million figure, but those details remain allegations without independent confirmation in the available coverage [6] [1].
6. Alternative viewpoints and skepticism
Several outlets and summaries present skepticism: The Jerusalem Post observed Owens’ claims “though no evidence or official confirmation has been provided” [3]. Other sites relayed the claim more credulously or repeated it as news, illustrating divergent editorial approaches and the role of audience expectations in coverage [4] [5].
7. What is not found in current reporting
Available sources do not include any public statement from the U.S. President or any named U.S. intelligence agency that confirms Macron threatened or ordered an assassination against Candace Owens; they also do not present documents or independent evidence validating Owens’ source or the alleged $1.5 million transaction beyond her claim [1] [2]. No article in the provided set shows legal or intelligence confirmation of the assassination allegation [1] [3].
8. Takeaway for readers trying to assess the claim
Extraordinary claims require independent evidence. The current reporting documents Owens’ public allegations and her statement that she informed U.S. officials, but it also records the absence of corroboration and notes active legal tensions between Owens and the Macrons that frame the dispute [1] [6]. Readers should treat the allegation as unverified until U.S. authorities or neutral investigative reporting produce confirming evidence [1] [3].