How have immigration and border-crossing patterns changed where the wall exists versus where it does not by 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
By mid‑2025 detected unauthorized crossings at the U.S.–Mexico border dropped sharply from 2024 levels — monthly sector totals fell by more than 80–90% in some months and the Border Patrol recorded roughly 8,400 detected attempts in September 2025, an 84.4% year‑over‑year drop for that month [1]. Official agency statements and advocacy analyses credit a mix of U.S. policy changes, Mexican enforcement and new asylum rules rather than a single physical barrier; port‑level legal crossings are tracked by BTS but comparative public data about “where a wall exists vs. where it does not” are not provided in the sources (p1_s1; available sources do not mention direct wall-vs‑no‑wall comparative statistics).
1. Big fall in detected crossings, but multiple drivers, not just steel and concrete
Across 2024–25 official and independent reporting documents a dramatic decline in Border Patrol encounters — for example, September 2025 detections fell 84.4% from a year earlier and several months in early‑2025 showed year‑over‑year declines in excess of 90% in sector apprehensions [1] [2]. Analysts and migration experts in Migration Policy note that U.S. policy changes (such as the June 2024 “Secure the Border” rule and later restrictions), stepped‑up Mexican enforcement and operational shifts (CBP One appointments, expulsions and other tools) account for much of the reduction [3]. Agency claims that borders are “more secure” accompany the statistics, but those statements sit alongside independent explanations that stress multiple causes [4] [3].
2. Where the wall stands is not the single observable variable in public datasets
The Bureau of Transportation Statistics provides port‑level inbound crossing counts for pedestrians, vehicles and trucks at official ports of entry, but BTS and CBP data do not present a clean, public comparison of illegal crossings broken down by locations with completed wall segments versus those without [5]. The sources available do not supply the explicit, geocoded wall‑presence versus wall‑absence comparison the question asks for; the datasets report ports, sectors and nationwide encounters but not a labeled “wall/no wall” field (p1_s1; available sources do not mention a direct wall‑vs‑no‑wall metric).
3. Local patterns changed: San Diego and other sectors saw very large declines
Sector‑level reporting highlights striking local variation: for instance, the San Diego sector saw an especially steep fall — a reported 92.9% decline in crossings between September 2024 and September 2025 in one dataset — and other sectors registered dramatic year‑over‑year drops in early 2025 [1] [2]. WOLA and Reuters reporting also document quieter conditions in San Diego shelters and far fewer injuries from falling off the border fence there, indicating that operational and policy changes plus local enforcement affected the flow in specific sectors [6].
4. Policy and enforcement shifts reshaped incentives to cross between ports
Analysts attribute reductions not only to border infrastructure but to rule changes that made asylum access and legal appointments more constrained and to increased Mexican interdictions. Migration Policy cites the Secure the Border rule (which limits asylum for those who crossed between ports and promoted CBP One screening at ports) and notes Mexican authorities recorded more migrant encounters than U.S. Border Patrol on many months — stressing cooperative enforcement as a key factor [3]. Axios and other reporting likewise emphasize Mexico’s role and U.S. administrative measures in driving down crossings [7].
5. Official narratives and independent caveats diverge; seasonal and political volatility matter
CBP and DHS framed 2025 lows as operational success, citing averages like about 952 encounters per day in May 2025 and record low monthly counts in March 2025 [4] [8]. Independent observers warn the trend is volatile and conditional: prior U.S. administrations have seen sharp swings, and experts say numbers can rebound or shift geographically depending on policy, diplomacy and enforcement tactics [7] [3]. WOLA flagged that after mid‑2025 some sectors began seeing rises again, reminding readers these are not permanent structural changes solely attributable to barriers [9].
6. Broader migration and labor effects — the downstream consequences
Research and commentary in late 2025 link the fall in net migration to labor‑market changes: Federal Reserve and regional Fed analyses estimated large declines in undocumented population and net migration in 2025, with implications for workforce size and job growth [10] [11] [12]. These studies point to enforcement and policy as drivers of population shifts, but they do not attribute labor effects specifically to wall construction vs. other measures [11] [12].
Limitations and open questions: public sources reviewed here document pronounced declines in detected crossings and strong claims that enforcement and cooperative measures played a central role, but they do not contain a straightforward, sourced comparison of crossing patterns segmented by “wall present” versus “wall absent” locations. For that precise, geospatial causal analysis, available sources do not provide the necessary labeled data (p1_s1; available sources do not mention wall‑vs‑no‑wall comparative statistics).