Have any federal or state prosecutors issued charges or indictments against Adam Schiff?
Executive summary
No. As of the reporting compiled here, federal and state prosecutors have opened inquiries into allegations involving Sen. Adam Schiff but have not filed criminal charges or returned indictments against him; news outlets report active investigations, questioning about the probe’s handling, and at least one local U.S. attorney privately concluded there was insufficient evidence to charge [1] [2] [3].
1. The formal state of play: investigations, subpoenas and grand-jury activity
Multiple mainstream outlets report that prosecutors and a federal grand jury have been involved in scrutiny related to allegations about Schiff — including subpoenas seeking documents and testimony tied to a Maryland mortgage-fraud inquiry and a probe into how that investigation was handled — but those procedural steps are not the same as an indictment, and no charging instrument against Schiff has been made public [1] [2] [4].
2. What prosecutors have done — and what they have not done
Reporting shows prosecutors in Maryland and federal authorities have interviewed witnesses, issued subpoenas and referred matters to a grand jury as part of inquiries touching on the Schiff matter, yet those actions have been described by the Department of Justice as subject to grand-jury secrecy and by news organizations as examinations of the handling of the probe rather than announcing charges against Schiff himself; outlets explicitly note the absence of an indictment to date [1] [2] [4].
3. A U.S. attorney’s assessment and media reporting on evidentiary strength
NBC, MSNBC and CNBC reporting summarized that the U.S. Attorney for Maryland told DOJ superiors she did not believe there was strong enough evidence to bring mortgage-fraud charges against Schiff, a judgment that aligns with coverage describing the investigation as stalled and informs why no charging decision has yet been made public [3] [1].
4. Political context and competing narratives about “weaponization”
News organizations such as Politico and Election Law Blog frame the probe within a broader political struggle — citing Republican pressure, Trump-era allies pushing referrals, and concerns among some Democrats and Republicans about DOJ politicization — which colors interpretation of prosecutorial activity but does not alter the factual record that no federal or state indictment has been returned against Schiff as reported [5] [6] [4]. Conservative and partisan outlets have advanced more accusatory narratives or predictions about potential penalties, but those pieces either postdate or go beyond the mainstream reporting of factual prosecutorial action and do not cite a filed indictment [7] [8].
5. Oversight of the probe and the limits of current reporting
Several outlets report the Justice Department itself is examining how the mortgage-fraud investigation was handled and has pursued related grand-jury questioning, a procedural development that underscores internal scrutiny of investigative methods rather than substantiated criminal charges against the senator; the DOJ and other implicated agencies declined public comment in the cited coverage, leaving open important factual gaps about ongoing internal reviews [2] [4].
6. Conclusion: narrow, evidence-based answer
Based on the available reporting, federal and state prosecutors have investigated and convened grand-jury activity connected to allegations involving Adam Schiff and examined the handling of that probe, but they have not issued charges or indictments against him as of the published reports; moreover, at least one U.S. attorney reportedly judged the evidence insufficient for indictment, which helps explain the absence of formal charges in the public record [1] [3] [2].