Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Did charlie kirk say a few gun deaths were ok to have the privilege of the 2nd Amendment

Checked on September 15, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement that Charlie Kirk said a few gun deaths were ok to have the privilege of the 2nd Amendment is partially supported by the analyses provided. According to [1], Charlie Kirk is quoted as saying "It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment" [1]. Similarly, [2] and [2] report that Charlie Kirk stated "I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God given rights" [2]. However, other sources, such as [3], [4], [5], and [6], do not provide direct quotes or information to support or contradict the claim [3] [4] [5] [6]. Key points from the analyses include the fact that Charlie Kirk was a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment and often spoke out against new gun restrictions [4], and that Utah, where Charlie Kirk was fatally shot, has strong pro-gun laws [6].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some important context is missing from the original statement, including the fact that Charlie Kirk's views on gun violence and the Second Amendment were likely shaped by his conservative ideology and his role as a prominent figure in the gun rights movement [1] [4]. Additionally, the analyses provided do not fully capture the complexity of the issue, including the perspectives of those who oppose Charlie Kirk's views on gun rights and the Second Amendment [7]. Alternative viewpoints that are not fully represented in the analyses include the perspectives of gun control advocates, who may argue that the cost of gun deaths is too high to justify the protection of the Second Amendment [7]. Some sources, such as [2] and [2], provide nuanced discussions of Charlie Kirk's views on gun violence and the Second Amendment, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the issue [2].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or biased in its characterization of Charlie Kirk's views on gun deaths and the Second Amendment. While some sources, such as [1] and [2], support the claim that Charlie Kirk said a few gun deaths were ok to have the privilege of the 2nd Amendment, others, such as [3] and [5], do not provide evidence to support or contradict the claim [3] [5]. Potential beneficiaries of this framing include gun rights advocates, who may use Charlie Kirk's statements to argue that the protection of the Second Amendment is worth the cost of some gun deaths [4]. On the other hand, gun control advocates may be harmed by this framing, as it may be used to undermine their efforts to restrict access to guns and reduce gun violence [7]. Overall, the original statement should be approached with caution, as it may reflect a biased or incomplete understanding of Charlie Kirk's views on gun deaths and the Second Amendment [1] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What is Charlie Kirk's stance on gun control legislation?
How many gun deaths occur annually in the United States?
What are the arguments for and against stricter gun laws in relation to the 2nd Amendment?
Has Charlie Kirk ever advocated for specific gun control measures?
How do other conservative figures view the trade-off between gun rights and gun violence?