Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: What specific anti-LGBTQ+ statements has Charlie Kirk made publicly?

Checked on September 17, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided shed light on Charlie Kirk's publicly stated views on LGBTQ+ issues, which have been a subject of controversy and debate. According to [1], Charlie Kirk opposed same-sex marriage, argued against gender care for transgender people, and attracted criticism for his comments on Pride month and celebrations, quoting him as saying "I believe marriage is one man one woman" and that "gay people should be welcome in the conservative movement" [1]. Additionally, [1] mentions a statement where he said "It should be legal to burn a rainbow or [Black Lives Matter] flag in public" [1]. Similarly, [1] notes that Charlie Kirk opposed same-sex marriage, argued against gender care for transgender people, and promoted false claims about Covid-19, also writing on X that it should be legal to burn a rainbow or Black Lives Matter flag in public, indicating his anti-LGBTQ+ stance [1]. Key statements from Charlie Kirk include his opposition to same-sex marriage and gender-affirming care for transgender people, as well as his suggestion that the Bible verse Leviticus 20:13 serves as 'God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters' [2]. These statements have been widely criticized and have contributed to the perception of Charlie Kirk as holding anti-LGBTQ+ views [1] [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

While the analyses provide insight into Charlie Kirk's views on LGBTQ+ issues, some sources do not provide specific quotes or statements, instead summarizing his stance as polarizing and critical of transgender rights [3]. Additionally, some analyses focus on Charlie Kirk's broader conservative activism and legacy, without directly addressing his anti-LGBTQ+ statements [4] [5]. Alternative viewpoints are also present, with some sources noting that Charlie Kirk believed "gay people should be welcome in the conservative movement" [1], which may suggest a more nuanced view on LGBTQ+ issues than initially apparent. However, these statements are not universally accepted and have been met with criticism from the LGBTQ+ community [1] [2]. Context is also important, as Charlie Kirk's views on LGBTQ+ issues are often cited as part of his broader conservative ideology, which emphasizes traditional Christian values and opposition to progressive social policies [2].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement asks for specific anti-LGBTQ+ statements made by Charlie Kirk, which may imply that his views on these issues are the primary focus of his public persona. However, some analyses suggest that Charlie Kirk's legacy is more complex, with his views on LGBTQ+ issues being just one aspect of his broader conservative activism [4] [5]. Bias may be present in the way that Charlie Kirk's views are framed, with some sources emphasizing his anti-LGBTQ+ statements as evidence of his conservative ideology [1] [2]. On the other hand, some sources may downplay or omit these statements, potentially due to a desire to present a more nuanced view of Charlie Kirk's legacy [3] [4] [5]. Misinformation may also be present, as some sources may misrepresent or exaggerate Charlie Kirk's views on LGBTQ+ issues, potentially due to a lack of context or a desire to advance a particular agenda [1]. Ultimately, a thorough understanding of Charlie Kirk's views on LGBTQ+ issues requires careful consideration of multiple sources and perspectives [6] [3] [1] [2] [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What are Charlie Kirk's views on same-sex marriage?
How has Charlie Kirk responded to criticism from LGBTQ+ advocacy groups?
What role does Turning Point USA play in promoting conservative values on college campuses regarding LGBTQ+ issues?
Can Charlie Kirk's statements be considered hate speech according to legal definitions?
How do Charlie Kirk's views on LGBTQ+ issues align with or diverge from those of other prominent conservative figures?